Address · Ward 6 · James Pasternak
6 Tippett Rd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 6 · James Pasternak
- Location
- 43.73313, -79.44720
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 8 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| James Pasternak | Councillor staff | 20 | 0 | 3 February 2026 |
| Ward 6 York Centre | Member of council | 12 | 2 | 18 February 2022 |
| Councillor James Pasternak | Councillor staff | 8 | 0 | 21 March 2017 |
| James Pasternak | Member of council | 5 | 2 | 12 August 2024 |
| James Pasternak | Councillor staff | 4 | 0 | 2 August 2022 |
| Engineering and Construction Services | City staff | 2 | 2 | 10 February 2017 |
| Ward 10 York Centre | Member of council | 2 | 1 | 30 January 2017 |
| Deputy City Manager's Office | City staff | 1 | 0 | 12 December 2017 |
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM30072 | Malibu Investments Inc. | 6 Tippett Road | Building Permits; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development App… | 1 January 2020 – 30 November 2026 | 41 |
| SM23922 | Tippett Developments Inc. and Wilson Yorkdale Inc | 6 Tippett Road. | Planning and Development Application, Site Plan | 13 January 2017 – 9 April 2021 | 13 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
6- Submitted 22 December 2025Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0534/25NYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 30 July 2024Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0379/24NYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 3 December 2021Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0851/21NYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 30 April 2018Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 18 150482 NNY 10 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 21 December 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A1129/17NYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 26 July 2016Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 16 196875 NNY 10 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 6 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0534/25NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 22 December 2025 | Closed Approved |
| A0379/24NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 30 July 2024 | Closed Approved |
| A0851/21NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 3 December 2021 | Closed Approved |
| 18 150482 NNY 10 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 30 April 2018 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| A1129/17NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 21 December 2017 | Closed Approved |
| 16 196875 NNY 10 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 26 July 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
6 Tippett Rd · Site Plan Approval (SA)
18 150482 NNY 10 SA · submitted 30 April 2018 · Closed · from registration SM23922 (Tippett Developments Inc. and Wilson Yorkdale Inc)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.80
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM23922: Assisting with permitting process for development and site application for 6 Tippett Road. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 150482 NNY 10 SA at 6 Tippett Rd: Site plan application for Phase 2 to permit a 16 storey mixed-use building with a total gross floor area of 26,495 square metres and a total of residential 408 units. The development proposal includes a 4 metre wide area along the northern boundary of the site towards the creation of an 18.5 metre … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Assisting with permitting process for development and site application for 6 Tippett Road.
Matched fields
- address
- 6 TIPPETT RD
- application_address
- 6 TIPPETT RD
6 Tippett Rd · Site Plan Approval (SA)
18 150482 NNY 10 SA · submitted 30 April 2018 · Closed · from registration SM30072 (Malibu Investments Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM30072: Tippett Yorkdale Inc.- Building Permits; Planning and Development Application, Zoning by-law; & Site Plan (Tippett Yorkdale Inc. Planning Application – Mixed Use (Residential and non-residential condominium development at 6 Tippett Road (OPA, ZBA, SPA); (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 150482 NNY 10 SA at 6 Tippett Rd: Site plan application for Phase 2 to permit a 16 storey mixed-use building with a total gross floor area of 26,495 square metres and a total of residential 408 units. The development proposal includes a 4 metre wide area along the northern boundary of the site towards the creation of an 18.5 metre … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: …lan (Tippett Yorkdale Inc. Planning Application – Mixed Use (Residential and non-residential condominium development at 6 Tippett Road (OPA, ZBA, SPA);
Matched fields
- address
- 6 TIPPETT RD
- application_address
- 6 TIPPETT RD
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 6
2 lobbied · 14 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 14 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 6
17 lobbied · 41 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 41 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 6
13 lobbied · 16 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 13 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.