Address · Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
5800 Yonge St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
- Location
- 43.78451, -79.41753
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 6 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lily Cheng | Member of council | 10 | 10 | 8 June 2026 |
| Ward 18 Willowdale | Member of council | 6 | 1 | 18 May 2022 |
| Development Review | City staff | 3 | 3 | 6 May 2025 |
| Mayor | Member of council | 2 | 0 | 3 April 2022 |
| Olivia Chow | Member of council | 2 | 0 | 14 January 2025 |
| Development and Growth Service | City staff | 1 | 1 | 11 December 2024 |
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM33990 | Times Group Corporation | 5800 Yonge Street | Building Permits; Planning and Development; Shelters | 15 December 2022 – 31 December 2026 | 16 |
| SM29836 | Times Group Corporation | 5800 Yonge St | Planning and Development | 1 March 2020 – 1 June 2022 | 8 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
6- Submitted 13 March 2025Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0110/25NYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 12 February 2024Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 24 114801 NNY 18 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 31 May 2023Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 23 153890 NNY 18 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 29 May 2023Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 23 152215 NNY 18 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 31 January 2020Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 20 110947 NNY 18 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 31 January 2020Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 20 110960 NNY 18 SBDraft Plan Approved · Approved
Data table· 6 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0110/25NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 13 March 2025 | Closed Approved |
| 24 114801 NNY 18 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 12 February 2024 | Under Review In progress |
| 23 153890 NNY 18 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 31 May 2023 | Under Review In progress |
| 23 152215 NNY 18 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 29 May 2023 | Under Review In progress |
| 20 110947 NNY 18 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 31 January 2020 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 20 110960 NNY 18 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 31 January 2020 | Draft Plan Approved Approved |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
5800 Yonge St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
20 110947 NNY 18 OZ · submitted 31 January 2020 · Closed · from registration SM29836 (Times Group Corporation)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.78
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM29836: Lobbying is related to a proposed development at 5800 Yonge St (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 110947 NNY 18 OZ at 5800 Yonge St: Application for Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment to permit four mixed use towers of 34, 37, 38 and 44 storeys containing 1,496 dwelling units, with a density of 3.6 times the site area, or a gross floor area of 117,827 square metres (111,188 square metres residential, 6,639 square metres n… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Lobbying is related to a proposed development at 5800 Yonge St
Matched fields
- address
- 5800 YONGE ST
- application_address
- 5800 YONGE ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 18
9 lobbied · 202 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 9 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 202 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 18
18 lobbied · 125 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 18 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 125 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 18
37 lobbied · 63 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 37 | — | 100% (n=8) | 0% | 24% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 63 | — | 64% (n=5) | 36% | 16% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.