Address · Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
5799-5915 Yonge Street
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
- Location
- 43.78530, -79.41629
- How this address was located
- Matched to the nearest civic number on the same street in the City's address points. Matched address: 5799 YONGE ST.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
6These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 7 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lily Cheng | Councillor staff | 145 | 24 | 1 October 2026 |
| Lily Cheng | Member of council | 85 | 24 | 1 October 2026 |
| Ward 18 Willowdale | Member of council | 37 | 19 | 24 May 2022 |
| John Filion | Councillor staff | 28 | 7 | 7 July 2022 |
| Ward 24 Willowdale | Member of council | 21 | 5 | 2 October 2018 |
| Office of Councillor Filion, Ward 18 | Councillor staff | 6 | 2 | 10 May 2021 |
| Mayor John Tory | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 4 October 2018 |
All registrations· 6 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM31332 | Aoyuan International | 5799-5915 Yonge Street | Planning and Development Application, Site Plan; Planning and Development Application, Minor Varian… | 3 March 2021 – 30 November 2021 | 9 |
| SM31333 | Aoyuan International | 5799-5915 Yonge Street | Planning and Development Application, Site Plan; Planning and Development Application, Minor Varian… | 3 March 2021 – 30 November 2021 | 5 |
| SM26363 | Ontario Aoyuan Property Limited | 5799-5915 Yonge Street | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 14 June 2018 – 14 May 2025 | 2 |
| SM25065 | M2M Development Corporation | 5799-5915 Yonge Street | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 21 September 2017 – 31 December 2026 | 306 |
| SM21940 | Silvercore Properties Inc. | 5799-5915 Yonge Street | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 9 June 2015 – 26 July 2023 | 1 |
| SM11842 | Silvercore Properties Inc. | 5799-5915 Yonge Street | Planning Applications - Official Plan, Zoning By-law | 9 June 2008 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
11- Submitted 23 April 2026Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0145/26NYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 25 March 2025Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 25 134322 NNY 18 OZCouncil Approved · Approved
- Submitted 7 May 2024Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0021/24NYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 6 May 2024Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 24 144846 NNY 18 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 12 October 2021Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 21 224408 NNY 18 CDDraft Plan Approved · Approved
- Submitted 26 March 2021Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 21 132353 NNY 18 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 22 October 2020Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 20 209468 NNY 18 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 6 March 2018Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 18 125604 NNY 24 SAFinal Approval Completed · Approved
- Submitted 27 December 2017Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0083/17NYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 5 October 2011Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 11 287471 NNY 24 OZOMB Approved · Approved
- Submitted 5 October 2011Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 11 287481 NNY 24 SBFinal Approval Completed · Approved
Data table· 11 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0145/26NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 23 April 2026 | Closed Approved |
| 25 134322 NNY 18 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 25 March 2025 | Council Approved Approved |
| B0021/24NY Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 7 May 2024 | Closed Approved |
| 24 144846 NNY 18 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 6 May 2024 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 21 224408 NNY 18 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 12 October 2021 | Draft Plan Approved Approved |
| 21 132353 NNY 18 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 26 March 2021 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 20 209468 NNY 18 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 22 October 2020 | Under Review In progress |
| 18 125604 NNY 24 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 6 March 2018 | Final Approval Completed Approved |
| B0083/17NY Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 27 December 2017 | Closed Approved |
| 11 287471 NNY 24 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 5 October 2011 | OMB Approved Approved |
| 11 287481 NNY 24 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 5 October 2011 | Final Approval Completed Approved |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
5799-5915 Yonge St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
20 209468 NNY 18 SA · submitted 22 October 2020 · Under Review · from registration SM31332 (Aoyuan International)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.80
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM31332: Community engagement related matters for the Newtonbrook Community Centre, 5799-5915 Yonge Street, 45 & 53 Cummer Avenue and 46 & 47 Avrill Crescent. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 209468 NNY 18 SA at 5799-5915 Yonge St: Site Plan Application for the second phase of the Newtonbrook Plaza development. Block 2 proposes a total gross floor area of 66,838.9 square metres, consisting of 63,152.3 square metres of residential GFA and 3,628.0 square metres of commercial GFA. The proposed mixed use building would contain tw… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Community engagement related matters for the Newtonbrook Community Centre, 5799-5915 Yonge Street, 45 & 53 Cummer Avenue and 46 & 47 Avrill Crescent.
Matched fields
- address
- 5799-5915 YONGE ST
- application_address
- 5799-5915 YONGE ST
5799-5915 Yonge St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
20 209468 NNY 18 SA · submitted 22 October 2020 · Under Review · from registration SM31333 (Aoyuan International)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.81
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM31333: Community engagement related matters for the Newtonbrook Community Centre: 5799-5915 Yonge Street, 45 & 53 Cummer Ave, and 46 & 47 Avrill Crescent. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 209468 NNY 18 SA at 5799-5915 Yonge St: Site Plan Application for the second phase of the Newtonbrook Plaza development. Block 2 proposes a total gross floor area of 66,838.9 square metres, consisting of 63,152.3 square metres of residential GFA and 3,628.0 square metres of commercial GFA. The proposed mixed use building would contain tw… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Community engagement related matters for the Newtonbrook Community Centre: 5799-5915 Yonge Street, 45 & 53 Cummer Ave, and 46 & 47 Avrill Crescent.
Matched fields
- address
- 5799-5915 YONGE ST
- application_address
- 5799-5915 YONGE ST
5799-5915 Yonge St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
18 125604 NNY 24 SA · submitted 6 March 2018 · Final Approval Completed · from registration SM25049 (2591260 Ontario Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM25049: Development application at the Newtonbrook Plaza site in North York Centre (address, 5915 Yonge Street). (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 125604 NNY 24 SA at 5799-5915 Yonge St: Site plan approval application for the first phase (Block 1) of the Newtonbrook Plaza re-development. Phase 1 includes two mixed-use towers of 34 and 32 storeys with a total of 810 residential units. A total gross floor area of 73,345.6 square metres is proposed, of which 65,100 square metres will … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Development application at the Newtonbrook Plaza site in North York Centre (address, 5915 Yonge Street).
Matched fields
- address
- 5915 YONGE ST
- application_address
- 5799-5915 YONGE ST
5799-5915 Yonge St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
11 287471 NNY 24 OZ · submitted 5 October 2011 · OMB Approved · from registration SM15544 (Silvercore Properties Inc.)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.95
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM15544: Representative for a rezoning and official plan amendment at Netwonbrook Plaza (main address 5799 Yonge Street) (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 287471 NNY 24 OZ at 5799-5915 Yonge St: Proposed redevelopment of the 'Newtonbrook Plaza' and adjacent lands for a mixed-use project with 1,674 residential units in 3 blocks with 4 buildings of 28, 36, 36 and 44 storeys, at-grade retail uses, office uses, townhouses and a new public park and street. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Representative for a rezoning and official plan amendment at Netwonbrook Plaza (main address 5799 Yonge Street)
Matched fields
- address
- 5799 YONGE ST
- application_address
- 5799-5915 YONGE ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 18
9 lobbied · 202 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 9 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 202 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 18
37 lobbied · 63 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 37 | — | 100% (n=8) | 0% | 24% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 63 | — | 64% (n=5) | 36% | 16% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 18
1 lobbied · 5 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 5 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 18
18 lobbied · 125 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 18 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 125 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.