Development application · Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
Development application 11 287481 NNY 24 SB
- Status
- Final Approval Completed
- Approved
- Submitted
- 5 October 2011
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
- Addresses
- 5799-5915 Yonge Street
- Ward
- Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
- Submitted
- 5 October 2011
- Status
- Final Approval Completed
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 11 287471 NNY 24 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
A zoning by-law amendment and a draft plan of subdivision approval respecting that part of the Subject Lands proposed for redevelopment and a public park. 46 & 47 Averill Crescent.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Aoyuan InternationalSM31332 · 3 March 2021 · “5799-5915 Yonge Street”
- Aoyuan InternationalSM31333 · 3 March 2021 · “5799-5915 Yonge Street”
- Ontario Aoyuan Property LimitedSM26363 · 14 June 2018 · “5799-5915 Yonge Street”
- M2M Development CorporationSM25065 · 21 September 2017 · “5799-5915 Yonge Street”
- Silvercore Properties Inc.SM21940 · 9 June 2015 · “5799-5915 Yonge Street”
- Silvercore Properties Inc.SM11842 · 9 June 2008 · “5799-5915 Yonge Street”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.