Development application · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)

Development application 21 224408 NNY 18 CD

Ward 18 · Lily ChengDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Draft Plan Approved; Approved
Submitted: 12 October 2021; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
Addresses: 5799-5915 Yonge Street
Ward: Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
Submitted: 12 October 2021
Status: Draft Plan Approved
Outcome recorded: Approved
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 808 units
Related file: 18 125604 NNY 24 SA

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Standard Residential Condominium application which will be comprised of 808 residential units. The Phase 1 development consists of one mixed-use building comprised of two towers of 36 and 34 storeys connected by a shared podium and a 4-level parking garage. There are retail, office, and commercial parking components of the site within the project which are not part of this application.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Aoyuan International
SM31332 · 3 March 2021 · “5799-5915 Yonge Street”
Aoyuan International
SM31333 · 3 March 2021 · “5799-5915 Yonge Street”
Ontario Aoyuan Property Limited
SM26363 · 14 June 2018 · “5799-5915 Yonge Street”
M2M Development Corporation
SM25065 · 21 September 2017 · “5799-5915 Yonge Street”
Silvercore Properties Inc.
SM21940 · 9 June 2015 · “5799-5915 Yonge Street”
Silvercore Properties Inc.
SM11842 · 9 June 2008 · “5799-5915 Yonge Street”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 18

1 lobbied · 5 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

28 lobbied · 95 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Data table· 4 rows

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 18: 1 lobbied and 5 matched unlobbied applications in 1 matched stratum
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	1	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	5	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide: 28 lobbied and 95 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	28	—	100% (n=3)	0%	0%	0.04
Matched, unlobbied	95	—	100% (n=6)	0%	0%	0.03

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.