Address · Ward 3 · Amber Morley
5485-5487 Dundas St. W
- Communications on those registrations
- 0
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 3 · Amber Morley
- Location
- 43.63244, -79.54345
- How this address was located
- Matched to the nearest civic number on the same street in the City's address points. Matched address: 5485 DUNDAS ST W.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM15548 | Mr. Angelo Scauzillo & Mr. Michael Scauzillo | 5485-5487 Dundas St. W | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 1 October 2010 – 30 September 2011 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
5- Submitted 18 October 2022Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 22 218615 WET 03 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 24 December 2019Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 19 264584 WET 03 SBDraft Plan Approved · Approved
- Submitted 27 December 2018Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 18 272103 WET 03 SANOAC Issued · Approved
- Submitted 27 December 2018Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 18 272108 WET 03 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 14 January 2011Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 11 107405 WET 05 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 5 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22 218615 WET 03 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 18 October 2022 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 19 264584 WET 03 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 24 December 2019 | Draft Plan Approved Approved |
| 18 272103 WET 03 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 27 December 2018 | NOAC Issued Approved |
| 18 272108 WET 03 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 27 December 2018 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 11 107405 WET 05 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 14 January 2011 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
5421-5429 Dundas St W · Site Plan Approval (SA)
18 272103 WET 03 SA · submitted 27 December 2018 · NOAC Issued · from registration SM23851 (Mondiale Development LTD.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.85
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM23851: 5415, 5421-5429, 5453, 5475, 5481, 5485 and 5487 Dundas Street West and 15 and 25 Shorncliffe Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 272103 WET 03 SA at 5421-5429 Dundas St W: Site Plan application for Phase 2 of a larger multi-phased development at Dundas Street West and Shorncliffee Road. This application is proposing two towers of 44 and 40-storeys connected by a six storey base building fronting onto a private street. A total of 843 dwelling units, 775 parking spaces… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 5415, 5421-5429, 5453, 5475, 5481, 5485 and 5487 Dundas Street West and 15 and 25 Shorncliffe Road
Matched fields
- address
- 5487 DUNDAS ST W
- application_address
- 5485-5487 DUNDAS ST W
5485-5487 Dundas St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
11 107405 WET 05 OZ · submitted 14 January 2011 · Closed · from registration SM15548 (Mr. Angelo Scauzillo & Mr. Michael Scauzillo)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.80
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM15548: Zoning By-law Amendment Application to be submitted to facilitate the proposed re-development of 5485-5487 Dundas St. W, Etobicoke for higher density residential and commercial uses. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 107405 WET 05 OZ at 5485-5487 Dundas St W: Proposal to develop a 26 storey condominium apartment building with eight storey section facing Dundas Street West, including a one-storey commercial podium and eleven (11) two storey residential townhouses. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Zoning By-law Amendment Application to be submitted to facilitate the proposed re-development of 5485-5487 Dundas St. W, Etobicoke for higher density residential and commercial uses.
Matched fields
- address
- 5485-5487 DUNDAS ST W
- application_address
- 5485-5487 DUNDAS ST W
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 3
37 lobbied · 72 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 37 | — | 100% (n=2) | 0% | 19% | 0.27 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 72 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 15% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 3
1 lobbied · 1 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 3
24 lobbied · 100 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 24 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 4% | 0.25 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 100 | 1,629 | 70% (n=10) | 30% | 4% | 0.14 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.