Development application · Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
Development application 19 264584 WET 03 SB
15 Shorncliffe Rd; 25 Shorncliffe Rd; 5415 Dundas St W; 5421-5429 Dundas St W; 5449-5453 Dundas St W; 5475 Dundas St W; 5481 Dundas St W; 5485-5487 Dundas St. W
- Status
- Draft Plan Approved
- Approved
- Submitted
- 24 December 2019
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
- Addresses
- 15 Shorncliffe Rd; 25 Shorncliffe Rd; 5415 Dundas St W; 5421-5429 Dundas St W; 5449-5453 Dundas St W; 5475 Dundas St W; 5481 Dundas St W; 5485-5487 Dundas St. W
- Ward
- Ward 3 · Amber Morley
- Submitted
- 24 December 2019
- Status
- Draft Plan Approved
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 18 272108 WET 03 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
A Draft Plan of Subdivision application to create a J-shaped public street that connects Dundas Street West to Shorncliffe Road that will service 4 development blocks and a public park. This application is associated and to be concurrently reviewed with Zoning by-law Amendment, file no. 18 272108 WET 03 OZ.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Mondiale Development LTD.SM23851 · 1 January 2016 · “25 Shorncliffe Road”
- 2019579 ONTARIO INC.SM17560 · 13 December 2011 · “25 Shorncliffe Road”
- Dunshorn Holdings Inc.SM16597 · 21 June 2011 · “25 Shorncliffe Road”
- Dunshorn Holdings Inc.SM16597 · 21 June 2011 · “5481 Dundas Street West”
- Mr. Angelo Scauzillo & Mr. Michael ScauzilloSM15548 · 1 October 2010 · “5485-5487 Dundas St. W”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 3
1 lobbied · 1 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.