Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 14 173892 STE 27 OZ

26 Cumberland St; 27 Yorkville Ave; 37 Yorkville Ave; 50 Cumberland St

Ward 11 · Dianne SaxeDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 13 June 2014; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 26 Cumberland St; 27 Yorkville Ave; 37 Yorkville Ave; 50 Cumberland St
Ward: Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
Submitted: 13 June 2014
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 1,100 units
Related file: 12 191650 STE 27 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

To obtain an Official Plan Ammendment (See related rezoning file: 12 191650 STE 27 OZ) to permit a mixed-use development with a podium building and a 40 and 62-storey towers. A total of 1100 dwelling units are proposed, and the ground floor of the podium will be non-residential uses. A total of 1136 parking spaces will be provided below grade and above grade including an 800 Toronto Parking Authority facility.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Kingsett Capital
SM24823 · 7 July 2017 · “37 Yorkville Avenue”
Minto Communities Inc.
SM20950 · 6 October 2014 · “37 Yorkville Avenue”
Minto Urban Communities
SM17280 · 6 October 2011 · “37 YORKVILLE AVENUE”
Minto Urban Communities
SM17280 · 6 October 2011 · “50 CUMBERLAND STREET”
Empire Restaurant
SM15550 · 10 December 2010 · “50 Cumberland Street”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 11

69 lobbied · 60 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=9
Matched, unlobbied100% n=4

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied10%
Matched, unlobbied11%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 11: 69 lobbied and 60 matched unlobbied applications in 31 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	69	—	100% (n=9)	0%	10%	0.04
Matched, unlobbied	60	—	100% (n=4)	0%	11%	0.03

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.