Address · Ward 4 · Gord Perks
403 Keele St
- Communications on those registrations
- 0
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 4 · Gord Perks
- Location
- 43.66633, -79.46453
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM32918 | Core Development Group Ltd. | 403 Keele Street | Planning and Development; Planning and Development Application; Planning and Development Applicatio… | 8 February 2022 – 31 December 2022 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
6- Submitted 24 April 2026Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 26 149594 STE 04 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 6 January 2026Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0031/26TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 23 December 2025Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application COA-5759452Cancelled · Withdrawn
- Submitted 26 March 2024Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 24 129645 STE 04 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 29 April 2022Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 22 140177 STE 04 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 4 November 2021Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 21 234418 STE 04 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 6 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26 149594 STE 04 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 24 April 2026 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| A0031/26TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 6 January 2026 | Closed Approved |
| COA-5759452 Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 23 December 2025 | Cancelled Withdrawn |
| 24 129645 STE 04 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 26 March 2024 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 22 140177 STE 04 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 29 April 2022 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 21 234418 STE 04 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 4 November 2021 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
50 Heintzman St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
22 140177 STE 04 SA · submitted 29 April 2022 · Closed · from registration SM32918 (Core Development Group Ltd.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM32918: Development application for mid-rise mixed use building at 403 Keele Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 140177 STE 04 SA at 50 Heintzman St: Redevelopment of the site for a 11-storey mixed-use building having a non-residential gross floor area of 271 square metres, and a residential gross floor area of 16,185.2 square metres. A total of 281 dwelling units are proposed, located above the ground floor. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Development application for mid-rise mixed use building at 403 Keele Street
Matched fields
- address
- 403 KEELE ST
- application_address
- 403 KEELE ST
403 Keele St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
21 234418 STE 04 OZ · submitted 4 November 2021 · Closed · from registration SM32918 (Core Development Group Ltd.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.85
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM32918: Development application for mid-rise mixed use building at 403 Keele Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 234418 STE 04 OZ at 403 Keele St: Zoning By-law amendment application to facilitate the redevelopment of the site for a0 11-storey mixed-use building having a non-residential gross floor area of 193 square metres, and a residential gross floor area of 14935 square metres. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Development application for mid-rise mixed use building at 403 Keele Street
Matched fields
- address
- 403 KEELE ST
- application_address
- 403 KEELE ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 4
17 lobbied · 33 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 33 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 4
8 lobbied · 130 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 130 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 4
12 lobbied · 20 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 12 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 20 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.