Address · Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
40 Hendon Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
- Location
- 43.78111, -79.41924
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
7- Submitted 8 June 2026Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 26 179698 NNY 18 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 12 December 2025Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0527/25NYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 10 June 2025Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 25 174797 NNY 18 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 23 December 2024Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 24 253157 NNY 18 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 16 May 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 155487 NNY 18 SANOAC Issued · Approved
- Submitted 23 December 2019Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 19 264461 NNY 18 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 28 January 2019Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 19 109332 NNY 18 OZOMB Appeal · In progress
Data table· 7 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26 179698 NNY 18 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 8 June 2026 | Under Review In progress |
| A0527/25NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 12 December 2025 | Closed Approved |
| 25 174797 NNY 18 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 10 June 2025 | Under Review In progress |
| 24 253157 NNY 18 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 23 December 2024 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 21 155487 NNY 18 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 16 May 2021 | NOAC Issued Approved |
| 19 264461 NNY 18 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 23 December 2019 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 19 109332 NNY 18 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 28 January 2019 | OMB Appeal In progress |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
40 Hendon Ave · Site Plan Approval (SA)
25 174797 NNY 18 SA · submitted 10 June 2025 · Under Review · from registration SM36549 (Kilmer Brownfield Management Limited)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.87
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM36549: Planning applications (OPA/ZBA/SPA) for 41-47 Hendon Ave (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 25 174797 NNY 18 SA at 40 Hendon Ave: Site Plan Control Application proposes the development of an 38-storey mixed-use building providing rental residential and retail use at grade. The building will provide a total of 399 residential units, being a mix of studio, 1-bedroom, 2-bedroom, and 3-bedroom units. The building will also provid… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Planning applications (OPA/ZBA/SPA) for 41-47 Hendon Ave
Matched fields
- address
- 41-47 HENDON AVE
- application_address
- 41 HENDON AVE
42 Hendon Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
24 253157 NNY 18 OZ · submitted 23 December 2024 · Closed · from registration SM36182 (Capital Developments)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM36182: 41 - 47 Hendon Ave (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 24 253157 NNY 18 OZ at 42 Hendon Ave: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit the redevelopment of the subject site with an 11-storey (41-metre) residential building containing a total of 148 dwelling units. The proposal includes a gross floor area of approximately 10,144 square metres, resulting in a density of… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 41 - 47 Hendon Ave
Matched fields
- address
- 41-47 HENDON AVE
- application_address
- 42 HENDON AVE
42 Hendon Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
24 253157 NNY 18 OZ · submitted 23 December 2024 · Closed · from registration SM36549 (Kilmer Brownfield Management Limited)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.87
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM36549: Planning applications (OPA/ZBA/SPA) for 41-47 Hendon Ave (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 24 253157 NNY 18 OZ at 42 Hendon Ave: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit the redevelopment of the subject site with an 11-storey (41-metre) residential building containing a total of 148 dwelling units. The proposal includes a gross floor area of approximately 10,144 square metres, resulting in a density of… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Planning applications (OPA/ZBA/SPA) for 41-47 Hendon Ave
Matched fields
- address
- 41-47 HENDON AVE
- application_address
- 42 HENDON AVE
42 Hendon Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
24 253157 NNY 18 OZ · submitted 23 December 2024 · Closed · from registration SM36946 (Max Vossough)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.88
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM36946: 24164 - 40-48 Hendon Ave. 11 storey residential building. OPA/ZBA. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 24 253157 NNY 18 OZ at 42 Hendon Ave: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit the redevelopment of the subject site with an 11-storey (41-metre) residential building containing a total of 148 dwelling units. The proposal includes a gross floor area of approximately 10,144 square metres, resulting in a density of… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 24164 - 40-48 Hendon Ave. 11 storey residential building. OPA/ZBA.
Matched fields
- address
- 40-48 HENDON AVE
- application_address
- 40 HENDON AVE
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 18
18 lobbied · 125 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 18 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 125 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 18
9 lobbied · 202 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 9 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 202 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 18
38 lobbied · 63 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 38 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 21% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 63 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 15% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.