lobbyTO

Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 26 121464 NNY 18 SA

32 Brenham Cres; 3386 Bayview Ave; 3388 Bayview Ave; 3390 Bayview Ave; 3392 Bayview Ave; 3394 Bayview Ave; 3396 Bayview Ave; 3398 Bayview Ave

Ward 18 · Lily ChengDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page
Status
Under Review
In progress
Submitted
25 February 2026
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
0
None published
Communications on linked registrations
0

Application record

Type
Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses
32 Brenham Cres; 3386 Bayview Ave; 3388 Bayview Ave; 3390 Bayview Ave; 3392 Bayview Ave; 3394 Bayview Ave; 3396 Bayview Ave; 3398 Bayview Ave
Ward
Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
Submitted
25 February 2026
Status
Under Review
Outcome recorded
In progress
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description
11,415 m² gross floor area
Related file
24 235666 NNY 18 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Site Plan Control Application for six blocks of four-storey townhouses. The blocks will consist a total of 50 three-bedroom townhouses. A paved access from Bayview Avenue and Brenham Crescent will also be provided, leading to one level of at-grade garage parking (providing a total of 100 parking spaces). The proposed development provides a total GFA of 11,415 square metres and a FSI of 1.61.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 18

18 lobbied · 125 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied—
  • Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=61
  • Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied4%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%
Data table· 4 rows
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 18: 18 lobbied and 125 matched unlobbied applications in 16 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied18Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied125Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied449—100% (n=61)0%4%0.07
Matched, unlobbied1,23772797% (n=96)3%3%0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.