lobbyTO

Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 21 201846 STE 09 SA

278 Sterling Rd; 1423 Bloor St W; 1425 Bloor St W; 1425A Bloor St W; 1427 Bloor St W; 1429 Bloor St W; 1431 Bloor St W; 1433 Bloor St W; 1435 Bloor St W; 1435-1437 Bloor St W; 1437 Bloor St W

Ward 9 · Alejandra BravoDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page
Status
Under Review
In progress
Submitted
20 August 2021
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
0
None published
Communications on linked registrations
0

Application record

Type
Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses
278 Sterling Rd; 1423 Bloor St W; 1425 Bloor St W; 1425A Bloor St W; 1427 Bloor St W; 1429 Bloor St W; 1431 Bloor St W; 1433 Bloor St W; 1435 Bloor St W; 1435-1437 Bloor St W; 1437 Bloor St W
Ward
Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
Submitted
20 August 2021
Status
Under Review
Outcome recorded
In progress
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description
14,460 m² gross floor area
Related file
21 139658 STE 09 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Site Plan Approval for an 18-storey mixed-use building having a non-residential gross floor area of 401 square metres, and a residential gross floor area of 14,460.4 square metres.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 9

20 lobbied · 21 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=4
  • Matched, unlobbied100% n=4

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied—
  • Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=61
  • Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied4%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%
Data table· 4 rows
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 9: 20 lobbied and 21 matched unlobbied applications in 12 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied20—100% (n=4)0%0%0.05
Matched, unlobbied21—100% (n=4)0%0%0.10
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied449—100% (n=61)0%4%0.07
Matched, unlobbied1,23772797% (n=96)3%3%0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.