Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
263 Adelaide St W
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Location
- 43.64783, -79.38948
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
8These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 5 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina | Member of council | 20 | 8 | 23 October 2017 |
| Councillor Cressy | Councillor staff | 6 | 1 | 15 July 2021 |
| Ward 10 Spadina-Fort York | Member of council | 2 | 0 | 15 January 2019 |
| Ausma Malik | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 6 October 2025 |
| Ausma Malik | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 6 October 2025 |
All registrations· 8 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM37016 | Fengate Capital Management Limited | 263 Adelaide St W | Building Permits; Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development App… | 2 October 2025 – 2 October 2026 | 0 |
| SM37017 | Fengate Capital Management Limited | 263 Adelaide St W | Affordable Housing; Planning and Development, Planning Policy / Study; Transportation | 2 October 2025 – 2 October 2026 | 0 |
| SM37018 | Fengate Capital Management Limited | 263 Adelaide St W | Building Permits; Planning and Development, Planning Policy / Study; Planning and Development Appli… | 2 October 2025 – 2 October 2026 | 2 |
| SM31955 | Lanterra Developments | 263 Adelaide Street West | Planning and Development; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Develop… | 29 June 2021 – 31 July 2027 | 1 |
| SM27330 | Adelaide St Lofts | 263 Adelaide St W | Planning and Development, Heritage | 11 January 2019 – 1 November 2019 | 2 |
| SM23707 | Neilas Inc. | 263 Adelaide Street West | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 11 November 2016 – 31 December 2017 | 2 |
| SM21102 | Adelaide St Lofts | 263 Adelaide St West | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 5 December 2014 – 10 January 2018 | 21 |
| SM18015 | 263 Adelaide St W Lofts Inc | 263 Adelaide St W | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 12 April 2012 – 7 March 2014 | 2 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 23 October 2025Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0847/25TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 23 December 2020Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 20 233451 STE 10 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 12 April 2012Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 12 152660 STE 20 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0847/25TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 23 October 2025 | Closed Approved |
| 20 233451 STE 10 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 23 December 2020 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 12 152660 STE 20 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 12 April 2012 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
263 Adelaide St W · Site Plan Approval (SA)
20 233451 STE 10 SA · submitted 23 December 2020 · Closed · from registration SM31955 (Lanterra Developments)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.92
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM31955: 263 Adelaide Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 233451 STE 10 SA at 263 Adelaide St W: 47-storey mixed-use building, with retail at-grade, office on the second to fourth floor, and 432 residential units above. The existing 5-storey heritage building is incorporated into the base of the new building. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 263 Adelaide Street West
Matched fields
- address
- 263 ADELAIDE ST W
- application_address
- 263 ADELAIDE ST W
Council and committee items naming this address
- 263 Adelaide Street West - Alterations to and Demolition of Heritage Attributes of a Designated Property Under Part IV, Sections 33 and 34 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement2024.PB19.4 · 5 June 2024
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 10
20 lobbied · 261 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | 136 | 100% (n=20) | 0% | 0% | 14% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 261 | 138 | 93% (n=214) | 7% | 5% | 18% |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | — | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 10% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.