Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 12 152660 STE 20 OZ
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 12 April 2012
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 263 Adelaide St W
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Submitted
- 12 April 2012
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Zoning Amendment application to facilitate the redevelopment of the site with a 49-storey mixed-use building including a 5-storey podium containing commercial uses.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Fengate Capital Management LimitedSM37016 · 2 October 2025 · “263 Adelaide St W”
- Fengate Capital Management LimitedSM37017 · 2 October 2025 · “263 Adelaide St W”
- Fengate Capital Management LimitedSM37018 · 2 October 2025 · “263 Adelaide St W”
- Lanterra DevelopmentsSM31955 · 29 June 2021 · “263 Adelaide Street West”
- Adelaide St LoftsSM27330 · 11 January 2019 · “263 Adelaide St W”
- Neilas Inc.SM23707 · 11 November 2016 · “263 Adelaide Street West”
- Adelaide St LoftsSM21102 · 5 December 2014 · “263 Adelaide St West”
- 263 Adelaide St W Lofts IncSM18015 · 12 April 2012 · “263 Adelaide St W”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 10% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.