Address · Ward 2 · Stephen Holyday
250 Wincott Dr
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 2 · Stephen Holyday
- Location
- 43.67979, -79.54664
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
5These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 9 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 2 Etobicoke Centre | Member of council | 10 | 10 | 15 June 2021 |
| Ward 4 Etobicoke Centre | Member of council | 8 | 8 | 25 September 2017 |
| Stephen Holyday | Member of council | 6 | 6 | 12 January 2026 |
| Olivia Chow | Member of council | 5 | 0 | 14 December 2023 |
| Ward 1 Etobicoke North | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 16 April 2021 |
| Ward 11 York South-Weston | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 22 December 2016 |
| Ward 2 Etobicoke North | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 22 November 2016 |
| Ward 3 Etobicoke Centre | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 17 November 2016 |
| Stephen Holyday | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 26 May 2025 |
All registrations· 5 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM36644 | Trinity Development Group Inc. | 250 Wincott Drive | Planning and Development Application; Zoning By-law | 26 May 2025 – 24 May 2027 | 4 |
| SM31594 | Trinity Development Group Inc. | 250 Wincott Drive | Planning and Development Application; Zoning By-law | 16 April 2021 – 31 December 2026 | 18 |
| SM22981 | Trinity Development Group Inc. | 250 Wincott Dr. | Planning and Development, Planning Policy / Study; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-… | 8 April 2016 – 6 October 2023 | 1 |
| SM22091 | Trinity Development Group Inc. | 250 Wincott Drive. | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 4 August 2015 – 4 January 2022 | 1 |
| SM22096 | Trinity Development Group Inc. | 250 Wincott Drive | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 27 July 2015 – 17 September 2020 | 11 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
10- Submitted 29 July 2025Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0288/25EYKClosed · Approved
- Submitted 24 February 2025Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0078/25EYKOMB Appeal · Refused
- Submitted 8 September 2023Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0033/23EYKOMB Appeal · In progress
- Submitted 18 April 2023Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0180/23EYKClosed · Approved
- Submitted 8 March 2023Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 23 121048 WET 02 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 6 January 2023Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 23 101352 WET 02 OZOMB Appeal · In progress
- Submitted 27 July 2022Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0416/22EYKClosed · Approved
- Submitted 27 July 2022Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0034/22EYKApproved with Conditions · Approved
- Submitted 20 April 2022Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 22 136287 WET 02 SANOAC Issued · Approved
- Submitted 30 April 2018Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 18 150932 WET 04 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 10 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0288/25EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 29 July 2025 | Closed Approved |
| A0078/25EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 24 February 2025 | OMB Appeal Refused |
| B0033/23EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 8 September 2023 | OMB Appeal In progress |
| A0180/23EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 18 April 2023 | Closed Approved |
| 23 121048 WET 02 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 8 March 2023 | Under Review In progress |
| 23 101352 WET 02 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 6 January 2023 | OMB Appeal In progress |
| A0416/22EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 27 July 2022 | Closed Approved |
| B0034/22EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 27 July 2022 | Approved with Conditions Approved |
| 22 136287 WET 02 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 20 April 2022 | NOAC Issued Approved |
| 18 150932 WET 04 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 30 April 2018 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
4620 Eglinton Ave W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
23 101352 WET 02 OZ · submitted 6 January 2023 · OMB Appeal · from registration SM31594 (Trinity Development Group Inc.)
Evidence High confidence · score 1.00
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM31594: Zoning By-law Amendment Application (Application 23 101352 WET 02 OZ) 250 Wincott Drive and 4620 Eglinton Avenue West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 23 101352 WET 02 OZ at 4620 Eglinton Ave W: Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit the construction of two new mixed-use buildings with heights of 24 and 29 storeys (Buildings A and B respectively). The proposal includes the provision of a 1,700 square metre public park and a 659 square metre privately-owned, publicly accessible space. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Zoning By-law Amendment Application (Application 23 101352 WET 02 OZ) 250 Wincott Drive and 4620 Eglinton Avenue West
- particulars: Zoning By-law Amendment Application (Application 23 101352 WET 02 OZ) 250 Wincott Drive and 4620 Eglinton Avenue West
Matched fields
- file_number
- 23 101352 WET 02 OZ
- address
- 250 WINCOTT DR
- application_address
- 250 WINCOTT DR
Notes
The registration names this application's file number.
4620 Eglinton Ave W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
23 101352 WET 02 OZ · submitted 6 January 2023 · OMB Appeal · from registration SM36644 (Trinity Development Group Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM36644: For 250 Wincott Drive (Richview Square), Zoning By-Law amendment application. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 23 101352 WET 02 OZ at 4620 Eglinton Ave W: Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit the construction of two new mixed-use buildings with heights of 24 and 29 storeys (Buildings A and B respectively). The proposal includes the provision of a 1,700 square metre public park and a 659 square metre privately-owned, publicly accessible space. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: For 250 Wincott Drive (Richview Square), Zoning By-Law amendment application.
Matched fields
- address
- 250 WINCOTT DR
- application_address
- 250 WINCOTT DR
Council and committee items naming this address
- 250 Wincott Drive and 4620 Eglinton Avenue West - Authority to Amend Section 37 Agreement to Reflect the Minor Variance Decision of the Committee of Adjustment2023.CC13.10 · 15 December 2023
- 250 Wincott Drive - Request for City Solicitor to Attend at the Ontario Land Tribunal - by Councillor Stephen Holyday, seconded by Councillor Parthi Kandavel2025.MM32.44 · 24 July 2025
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 2
7 lobbied · 115 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 7 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 115 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), Ward 2
2 lobbied · 22 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 22 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 2
5 lobbied · 15 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 5 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 15 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 2
9 lobbied · 10 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 9 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 10 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.