Committee of Adjustment application · Consent (severance) (CO)

Committee of Adjustment application B0033/23EYK

250 Wincott Dr

Ward 2 · Stephen HolydayDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: OMB Appeal; In progress
Submitted: 8 September 2023; Appealed
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Consent (severance) (CO)
Addresses: 250 Wincott Dr
Ward: Ward 2 · Stephen Holyday
Submitted: 8 September 2023
Status: OMB Appeal
Outcome recorded: In progress
Hearing date: —
Decision: —
Objection at the hearing: Not recorded
Appealed: Yes

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

To obtain consent to sever the property into 4 lots and to create multiple right-of-ways.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Trinity Development Group Inc.
SM36644 · 26 May 2025 · “250 Wincott Drive”
Trinity Development Group Inc.
SM31594 · 16 April 2021 · “250 Wincott Drive”
Trinity Development Group Inc.
SM22981 · 8 April 2016 · “250 Wincott Dr.”
Trinity Development Group Inc.
SM22091 · 4 August 2015 · “250 Wincott Drive.”
Trinity Development Group Inc.
SM22096 · 27 July 2015 · “250 Wincott Drive”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Consent (severance) (CO), Ward 2

2 lobbied · 22 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide

26 lobbied · 179 matched

Median days

Lobbied184
Matched, unlobbied115

Approval rate

Lobbied79% n=24
Matched, unlobbied88% n=133

Refusal rate

Lobbied21%
Matched, unlobbied12%

Appeal rate

Lobbied15%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Objection rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied25%

Data table· 4 rows

Consent (severance) (CO), Ward 2: 2 lobbied and 22 matched unlobbied applications in 2 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	2	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	22	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide: 26 lobbied and 179 matched unlobbied applications in 21 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	26	184	79% (n=24)	21%	15%	25%
Matched, unlobbied	179	115	88% (n=133)	12%	3%	25%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.