Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 22 136287 WET 02 SA

Ward 2 · Stephen HolydayDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: NOAC Issued; Approved
Submitted: 20 April 2022; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses: 250 Wincott Dr; 4620 Eglinton Ave W
Ward: Ward 2 · Stephen Holyday
Submitted: 20 April 2022
Status: NOAC Issued
Outcome recorded: Approved
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Related file: 18 150932 WET 04 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

This is the site plan control application for Phase 1 of the lands. Site Plan Control application to permit the development of Phase One and Phase Two of the redevelopment at 250 Wincott Drive and 4620 Eglinton Avenue West. The proposed development includes Building C, a new 12-storey (49 metres, including the mechanical penthouse), and Building D, an existing one-storey commercial building proposed to be partially demolished, altered (enhanced with a series of brick, metal and glass materials), and will continue to be used for retail commercial purposes.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Trinity Development Group Inc.
SM36644 · 26 May 2025 · “250 Wincott Drive”
Trinity Development Group Inc.
SM31594 · 16 April 2021 · “250 Wincott Drive”
Trinity Development Group Inc.
SM31594 · 16 April 2021 · “4620 Eglinton Avenue West”
Trinity Development Group Inc.
SM22981 · 8 April 2016 · “250 Wincott Dr.”
Trinity Development Group Inc.
SM22091 · 4 August 2015 · “250 Wincott Drive.”
Trinity Development Group Inc.
SM22096 · 27 July 2015 · “250 Wincott Drive”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 2

5 lobbied · 15 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=61
Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 2: 5 lobbied and 15 matched unlobbied applications in 4 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	5	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	15	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=61)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,237	727	97% (n=96)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.