Address · Ward 3 · Amber Morley
25 Audley St
- Communications on those registrations
- 0
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 3 · Amber Morley
- Location
- 43.61928, -79.49491
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM26422 | Roland Rietz | 25 Audley Street | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 19 June 2018 – 19 June 2019 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
4- Submitted 8 November 2021Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 21 235281 WET 03 SBUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 5 November 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 234685 WET 03 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 14 November 2017Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 17 262415 WET 06 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 21 December 2016Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 16 269352 WET 06 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 4 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 235281 WET 03 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 8 November 2021 | Under Review In progress |
| 21 234685 WET 03 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 5 November 2021 | Under Review In progress |
| 17 262415 WET 06 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 14 November 2017 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 16 269352 WET 06 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 21 December 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
25 Audley St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
17 262415 WET 06 OZ · submitted 14 November 2017 · Closed · from registration SM26422 (Roland Rietz)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.71
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM26422: OMB File No. PL160692 Official Plan and Zoning By- Law amendment applications. 25 Audley Street, Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 262415 WET 06 OZ at 25 Audley St: This application proposes to amend the Zoning By-laws to permit a 26-storey mixed use building with an 8-storey podium. The development would have a total of 29,929 m2 of gross floor area, of which 2,371 m2 would be for non-residential uses. The development would contain approximately 385 residenti… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: OMB File No. PL160692 Official Plan and Zoning By- Law amendment applications. 25 Audley Street, Toronto
Matched fields
- address
- 25 AUDLEY ST
- application_address
- 25 AUDLEY ST
25 Audley St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 269352 WET 06 OZ · submitted 21 December 2016 · Closed · from registration SM26422 (Roland Rietz)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.80
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM26422: OMB File No. PL160692 Official Plan and Zoning By- Law amendment applications. 25 Audley Street, Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 269352 WET 06 OZ at 25 Audley St: Official Plan Amendment application to permit a mixed-use development consisting of one residential apartment building. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: OMB File No. PL160692 Official Plan and Zoning By- Law amendment applications. 25 Audley Street, Toronto
Matched fields
- address
- 25 AUDLEY ST
- application_address
- 25 AUDLEY ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 3
1 lobbied · 1 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 3
24 lobbied · 100 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 24 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 4% | 0.25 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 100 | — | 71% (n=10) | 29% | 4% | 0.14 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 3
37 lobbied · 72 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 37 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 16% | 0.27 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 72 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 15% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.