Address · Ward 13 · Chris Moise
24 Eastern Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 13 · Chris Moise
- Location
- 43.65337, -79.35975
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 22 October 2021Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 21 229569 STE 13 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 23 December 2019Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 19 264378 STE 13 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 1 September 2016Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 16 216777 STE 28 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 229569 STE 13 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 22 October 2021 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 19 264378 STE 13 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 23 December 2019 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 16 216777 STE 28 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 1 September 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
24 Eastern Ave · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
21 229569 STE 13 CD · submitted 22 October 2021 · Closed · from registration SM24003 (Gilead Place Residents Group)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM24003: Representation of property owners in relation to application submitted for site located at 18-32 Eastern Avenue. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 229569 STE 13 CD at 24 Eastern Ave: The proposed condominium is a 12 storey residential building that contains 379 dwelling units andtwo below ground parking levels. The redevelopment proposes 25,127 sq. m of total gross floorarea (GFA), 758 sq. m of indoor amenity space and 810 sq. m of outdoor amenity space (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Representation of property owners in relation to application submitted for site located at 18-32 Eastern Avenue.
Matched fields
- address
- 18-32 EASTERN AVE
- application_address
- 18 EASTERN AVE
18 Eastern Ave · Site Plan Approval (SA)
19 264378 STE 13 SA · submitted 23 December 2019 · Closed · from registration SM24002 (Gilead Place Residents Group)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM24002: Providing professional planning advice and representation for a group of property owners on Gilead Place and their interest with regard to the application submitted for 18-32 Eastern Avenue (City File No. 16 216777 STE 29 OZ) (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 19 264378 STE 13 SA at 18 Eastern Ave: Site Plan Approval for new mixed-use building: 12 storeys plus mechanical penthouse, 379 dwelling units, 24671square metres of residential GFA and 890 square metres of retail. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: …entation for a group of property owners on Gilead Place and their interest with regard to the application submitted for 18-32 Eastern Avenue (City File No. 16 216777 STE 29 OZ)
Matched fields
- address
- 18-32 EASTERN AVE
- application_address
- 18 EASTERN AVE
18 Eastern Ave · Site Plan Approval (SA)
19 264378 STE 13 SA · submitted 23 December 2019 · Closed · from registration SM24003 (Gilead Place Residents Group)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.84
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM24003: Representation of property owners in relation to application submitted for site located at 18-32 Eastern Avenue. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 19 264378 STE 13 SA at 18 Eastern Ave: Site Plan Approval for new mixed-use building: 12 storeys plus mechanical penthouse, 379 dwelling units, 24671square metres of residential GFA and 890 square metres of retail. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Representation of property owners in relation to application submitted for site located at 18-32 Eastern Avenue.
Matched fields
- address
- 18-32 EASTERN AVE
- application_address
- 18 EASTERN AVE
18 Eastern Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 216777 STE 28 OZ · submitted 1 September 2016 · Closed · from registration SM24002 (Gilead Place Residents Group)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.95
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM24002: Providing professional planning advice and representation for a group of property owners on Gilead Place and their interest with regard to the application submitted for 18-32 Eastern Avenue (City File No. 16 216777 STE 29 OZ) (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 216777 STE 28 OZ at 18 Eastern Ave: OMB Approved mixed-use building: 12 storeys plus mechanical penthouse, 379 dwelling units, 24,237 square metres of residential GFA and 890 square metres of retail. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: …entation for a group of property owners on Gilead Place and their interest with regard to the application submitted for 18-32 Eastern Avenue (City File No. 16 216777 STE 29 OZ)
Matched fields
- address
- 18-32 EASTERN AVE
- application_address
- 18 EASTERN AVE
18 Eastern Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 216777 STE 28 OZ · submitted 1 September 2016 · Closed · from registration SM24003 (Gilead Place Residents Group)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.93
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM24003: Representation of property owners in relation to application submitted for site located at 18-32 Eastern Avenue. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 216777 STE 28 OZ at 18 Eastern Ave: OMB Approved mixed-use building: 12 storeys plus mechanical penthouse, 379 dwelling units, 24,237 square metres of residential GFA and 890 square metres of retail. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Representation of property owners in relation to application submitted for site located at 18-32 Eastern Avenue.
Matched fields
- address
- 18-32 EASTERN AVE
- application_address
- 18 EASTERN AVE
18 Eastern Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 216777 STE 28 OZ · submitted 1 September 2016 · Closed · from registration SM25940 (Alterra Development Group)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM25940: Applications in support of redevelopment of 32 Eastern Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 216777 STE 28 OZ at 18 Eastern Ave: OMB Approved mixed-use building: 12 storeys plus mechanical penthouse, 379 dwelling units, 24,237 square metres of residential GFA and 890 square metres of retail. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Applications in support of redevelopment of 32 Eastern Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 32 EASTERN AVE
- application_address
- 32 EASTERN AVE
18 Eastern Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 216777 STE 28 OZ · submitted 1 September 2016 · Closed · from registration SM27605 (Alterra-Finer (Corktown) LP)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.72
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM27605: Assisting with the development of 18-32 Eastern Ave (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 216777 STE 28 OZ at 18 Eastern Ave: OMB Approved mixed-use building: 12 storeys plus mechanical penthouse, 379 dwelling units, 24,237 square metres of residential GFA and 890 square metres of retail. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Assisting with the development of 18-32 Eastern Ave
Matched fields
- address
- 18-32 EASTERN AVE
- application_address
- 18 EASTERN AVE
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 13
4 lobbied · 23 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 23 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13
56 lobbied · 128 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 56 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 7% | 0.16 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 128 | — | 100% (n=8) | 0% | 2% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13
82 lobbied · 96 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 82 | — | 100% (n=13) | 0% | 11% | 0.15 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 96 | — | 90% (n=14) | 10% | 16% | 0.08 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.