Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
223 Adelaide St W
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Location
- 43.64823, -79.38777
- How this address was located
- Matched to the nearest civic number on the same street in the City's address points. Matched address: 225 ADELAIDE ST W (2 civic numbers away).
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 9 May 2016Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 16 152025 STE 20 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 28 May 2015Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 15 164825 STE 20 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16 152025 STE 20 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 9 May 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 15 164825 STE 20 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 28 May 2015 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
19 Duncan St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
16 152025 STE 20 SA · submitted 9 May 2016 · Closed · from registration SM21243 (Westbank Projects Corporation)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM21243: Rezoning and redevelopment of 19 Duncan Street, Toronto. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 152025 STE 20 SA at 19 Duncan St: Site Plan Approval to redevelop the site with a 57-storey mixed-use development including an eight-storey podium containing retail and office uses with residential units in the tower portion. A total of 124 parking spaces and 523 bicycle parking spaces are located in a below grade parking garage. T… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Rezoning and redevelopment of 19 Duncan Street, Toronto.
Matched fields
- address
- 19 DUNCAN ST
- application_address
- 19 DUNCAN ST
19 Duncan St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
15 164825 STE 20 OZ · submitted 28 May 2015 · Closed · from registration SM21243 (Westbank Projects Corporation)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM21243: Rezoning and redevelopment of 19 Duncan Street, Toronto. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 164825 STE 20 OZ at 19 Duncan St: Proposal to redevelop the site with a 59-storey (182 m excluding machanicals) mixed-use development including an eight-storey podium containing retail and office uses with residential units in the tower portion. A total of 498 units are proposed with 131 parking spaces and 685 bicycle parking space… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Rezoning and redevelopment of 19 Duncan Street, Toronto.
Matched fields
- address
- 19 DUNCAN ST
- application_address
- 19 DUNCAN ST
19 Duncan St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
15 164825 STE 20 OZ · submitted 28 May 2015 · Closed · from registration SM21475 (Westbank)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.76
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM21475: Planning and Development for 19 Duncan Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 164825 STE 20 OZ at 19 Duncan St: Proposal to redevelop the site with a 59-storey (182 m excluding machanicals) mixed-use development including an eight-storey podium containing retail and office uses with residential units in the tower portion. A total of 498 units are proposed with 131 parking spaces and 685 bicycle parking space… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Planning and Development for 19 Duncan Street
Matched fields
- address
- 19 DUNCAN ST
- application_address
- 19 DUNCAN ST
19 Duncan St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
15 164825 STE 20 OZ · submitted 28 May 2015 · Closed · from registration SM21699 (Humbold Properties)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.80
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM21699: Applications in support of rezoning for the property at 217 Adelaide St. W. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 164825 STE 20 OZ at 19 Duncan St: Proposal to redevelop the site with a 59-storey (182 m excluding machanicals) mixed-use development including an eight-storey podium containing retail and office uses with residential units in the tower portion. A total of 498 units are proposed with 131 parking spaces and 685 bicycle parking space… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Applications in support of rezoning for the property at 217 Adelaide St. W.
Matched fields
- address
- 217 ADELAIDE ST W
- application_address
- 219 ADELAIDE ST W
19 Duncan St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
15 164825 STE 20 OZ · submitted 28 May 2015 · Closed · from registration SM22331 (Humbold Properties)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.75
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22331: 217 Adelaide Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 164825 STE 20 OZ at 19 Duncan St: Proposal to redevelop the site with a 59-storey (182 m excluding machanicals) mixed-use development including an eight-storey podium containing retail and office uses with residential units in the tower portion. A total of 498 units are proposed with 131 parking spaces and 685 bicycle parking space… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 217 Adelaide Street West
Matched fields
- address
- 217 ADELAIDE ST W
- application_address
- 219 ADELAIDE ST W
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | 1,881 | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 11% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.