Committee of Adjustment application · Minor variance (MV)

Committee of Adjustment application A0137/22SC

Ward 20 · Parthi KandavelDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Approved
Submitted: 29 June 2022; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Minor variance (MV)
Addresses: 2217 Kingston Rd
Ward: Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
Submitted: 29 June 2022
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Approved
Hearing date: 18 August 2022
Decision: Approved
Objection at the hearing: Not recorded
Appealed: No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

To permit a seven-storey mixed use building containing a healing lodge and transitional housing with retail space on the ground floor and a healing lodge. The proposed healing lodge is a Residential Care Facility that provides a culturally-relevant, restorative care setting to aid Indigenous women who are making a transition from the correctional system into the community. A related Site Plan Control Application 21 117870 ESC 20 SA is currently under review by staff. Minor Variance Application A0132/19SC was approved to permit the proposed uses, relief to the stepbacks, setbacks, landscaping and parking. Additional information about this proposal, including details about the cultural programming proposed by the Thunder Woman Healing Lodge Society, are available online at the Application Information Centre at www.toronto.ca/aic.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Thunder Woman Healing Lodge
SM31846 · 15 June 2021 · “2217 Kingston Road”
Thunder Woman Healing Lodge Society
SM28307 · 7 June 2019 · “2217 Kingston Road”
Thunder Woman Healing Lodge Society
SM28237 · 27 May 2019 · “2217 Kingston Rd.”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Minor variance (MV), Ward 20

9 lobbied · 295 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 20: 9 lobbied and 295 matched unlobbied applications in 7 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	9	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	295	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.