lobbyTO

Address · Ward 22 · Nick Mantas

2035 Kennedy Rd

Registrations naming this address
4
3 client organisations
Communications on those registrations
27
6 offices contacted
Applications at this address
7
5 published links to lobbying
Council and committee items
0
Items naming this address

About this address

Ward
Ward 22 · Nick Mantas
Location
43.77756, -79.28275
How this address was located
Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

4

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

  • Norm Kelly, Ward 4010
  • Mayor's Office4
  • Ward 40 Scarborough-Agincourt4
  • Mayor John Tory3
  • Ward 34 Don Valley East3
  • Ward 39 Scarborough-Agincourt3
Data table· 6 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Norm Kelly, Ward 40Councillor staff10127 April 2018
Mayor's OfficeCouncillor staff402 November 2018
Ward 40 Scarborough-AgincourtMember of council4412 October 2016
Mayor John ToryCouncillor staff3030 October 2018
Ward 34 Don Valley EastMember of council3030 October 2018
Ward 39 Scarborough-AgincourtMember of council3030 October 2018
All registrations· 4 rows
RegistrationClientAs writtenSubject matterDatesCommunications
SM26899The Kennedy Hotel Inc.2035 Kennedy Road.Building Permits26 October 2018 – 25 October 20193
SM26863The Kennedy Hotel Inc.2035 Kennedy Road.Building Permits; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development App…18 October 2018 – 30 April 201910
SM21677Samm Holding Inc.2035 Kennedy RoadPlanning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B…20 April 2015 – 31 December 20160
SM21671Tarn Financial Corporation2035 Kennedy Rd.Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Site Plan15 April 2015 – 31 August 201814

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

7
Data table· 7 rows
ApplicationTypeSubmittedStatus
22 115095 ESC 22 SA
Development application
Site Plan Approval (SA)17 February 2022Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
B0056/19SC
Committee of Adjustment application
Consent (severance) (CO)16 December 2019Closed
Approved
COA-4696521
Committee of Adjustment application
Consent (severance) (CO)16 December 2019Cancelled
Withdrawn
B0004/17SC
Committee of Adjustment application
Consent (severance) (CO)18 January 2017Closed
Approved
COA-4093502
Committee of Adjustment application
Consent (severance) (CO)17 January 2017Cancelled
Withdrawn
16 132832 ESC 40 SA
Development application
Site Plan Approval (SA)29 March 2016Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
15 167709 ESC 40 OZ
Development application
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)3 June 2015Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 22

7 lobbied · 14 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied—
  • Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=61
  • Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied4%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%
Data table· 4 rows
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 22: 7 lobbied and 14 matched unlobbied applications in 5 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied7Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied14Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied449—100% (n=61)0%4%0.07
Matched, unlobbied1,23772797% (n=96)3%3%0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Committee of Adjustment applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide

26 lobbied · 179 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied184
  • Matched, unlobbied115

Approval rate

  • Lobbied79% n=24
  • Matched, unlobbied88% n=133

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied21%
  • Matched, unlobbied12%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied15%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%

Objection rate

  • Lobbied25%
  • Matched, unlobbied25%
Data table· 2 rows
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide: 26 lobbied and 179 matched unlobbied applications in 21 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateObjection rate
Lobbied2618479% (n=24)21%15%25%
Matched, unlobbied17911588% (n=133)12%3%25%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 22

6 lobbied · 10 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied1,925
  • Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=64
  • Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied13%
  • Matched, unlobbied13%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 22: 6 lobbied and 10 matched unlobbied applications in 4 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied6Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied10Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied5731,925100% (n=64)0%13%0.08
Matched, unlobbied7631,79398% (n=70)2%13%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.