lobbyTO

Committee of Adjustment application · Consent (severance) (CO)

Committee of Adjustment application B0056/19SC

2035 Kennedy Rd

Status
Closed
Approved
Submitted
16 December 2019
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
0
None published
Communications on linked registrations
0

Application record

Type
Consent (severance) (CO)
Addresses
2035 Kennedy Rd
Ward
Ward 22 · Nick Mantas
Submitted
16 December 2019
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Approved
Hearing date
29 April 2021
Decision
Approved
Objection at the hearing
Not recorded
Appealed
No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

2035 Kennedy Road - To convey a 1,644.7 sq. m. parcel of land on the vertical plane (being Parts 14, 15, 21, 22, 27, 37 through 43 and 45 on the draft Reference Plan) as a lot addition to the proposed condominium property to the west. Easements will be created in favour of the proposed condo property for vehicle and pedestrian access, for the support of the structure and for maintenance, repair and installation of utilities and services, and for maintenance and repair of the building (underground garage). 2031 Kennedy Road-To convey a 89.92 sq. m. parcel of land on the vertical plane (Parts 16, 28, 30 and 31 on the draft Reference Plan) as a lot addition to the Hotel Property to the east at 2035 Kennedy Road. An easement will be retained for maintenance, repair, and installation of utilities and services, along with an easement for maintenance and repair of the proposed building (underground garage); easements will be created in favour of the Hotel Property over the Condo Property for the support of the structure and for maintenance, repair and installation of utilities and services.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide

26 lobbied · 179 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied184
  • Matched, unlobbied115

Approval rate

  • Lobbied79% n=24
  • Matched, unlobbied88% n=133

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied21%
  • Matched, unlobbied12%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied15%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%

Objection rate

  • Lobbied25%
  • Matched, unlobbied25%
Data table· 2 rows
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide: 26 lobbied and 179 matched unlobbied applications in 21 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateObjection rate
Lobbied2618479% (n=24)21%15%25%
Matched, unlobbied17911588% (n=133)12%3%25%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.