Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 21 248581 STE 11 SA
2 Bloor St W; 5 Cumberland St; 820 Yonge St
- Status
- NOAC Issued
- Approved
- Submitted
- 14 December 2021
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 2 Bloor St W; 5 Cumberland St; 820 Yonge St
- Ward
- Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
- Submitted
- 14 December 2021
- Status
- NOAC Issued
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 725 units; 47,929 m² gross floor area
- Related file
- 18 221948 STE 27 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Site plan approval for a 75-storey mixed-use building having a non-residential of 1398 square metres and a residential gross floor area of 47929 square metres. 725 residential dwelling units are proposed. (NOTE: This is phase 2 of the development, and is the east side of the site)
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Kingsett CapitalSM27123 · 4 December 2018 · “2 Bloor Street West”
- Pattison Outdoor AdvertisingSM20152 · 5 March 2014 · “2 Bloor St. W”
- 2008221 Ontario Inc.SM15547 · 10 December 2010 · “2 Bloor Street West.”
- Oxford Properties GroupSM15744 · 1 December 2010 · “2 Bloor Street West”
- OPGI Management GP Inc.SM11804 · 26 May 2008 · “2 Bloor Street West”
- OPGI Management GP Inc.SM11735 · 12 May 2008 · “2 Bloor Street West”
- OPGI Management GP Inc.SM11757 · 12 May 2008 · “2 Bloor Street West”
- Oxford Properties GroupSM11789 · 12 May 2008 · “2 Bloor Street West”
- Oxford Properties GroupSM11791 · 12 May 2008 · “2 Bloor Street West”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 11
46 lobbied · 113 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 46 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 9% | 0.09 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 113 | — | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.02 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.