Development application · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
Development application 24 149283 NNY 15 CD
1710 Bayview Ave; 1712 Bayview Ave; 1714 Bayview Ave; 1716 Bayview Ave; 1718 Bayview Ave; 1720 Bayview Ave; 1722 Bayview Ave; 1724 Bayview Ave; 1726 Bayview Ave; 1728 Bayview Ave; 1730 Bayview Ave; 1732 Bayview Ave; 1734 Bayview Ave; 1736 Bayview Ave
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 15 May 2024
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
- Addresses
- 1710 Bayview Ave; 1712 Bayview Ave; 1714 Bayview Ave; 1716 Bayview Ave; 1718 Bayview Ave; 1720 Bayview Ave; 1722 Bayview Ave; 1724 Bayview Ave; 1726 Bayview Ave; 1728 Bayview Ave; 1730 Bayview Ave; 1732 Bayview Ave; 1734 Bayview Ave; 1736 Bayview Ave
- Ward
- Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos Lin
- Submitted
- 15 May 2024
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 197 units
- Related file
- 20 153356 NNY 15 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Draft Plan of Condominum application for a 9-storey mid-rise with 197 residential condominium units being constructed atop two levels of underground parking comprising of 98 residential parking spaces and 21 visitor parking spaces. It also has ground floor retail space.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Toronto (Bayview and Eglinton) Limited PartnershipSM30080 · 14 May 2020 · “1718 Bayview Avenue.”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.