Development application · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
Development application 21 230436 STE 10 CD
16 Oxley St; 46 Charlotte St; 355 Adelaide St W; 355-359 Adelaide St W
- Status
- Under Review
- In progress
- Submitted
- 25 October 2021
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
- Addresses
- 16 Oxley St; 46 Charlotte St; 355 Adelaide St W; 355-359 Adelaide St W
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Submitted
- 25 October 2021
- Status
- Under Review
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 387 units
- Related file
- 20 160837 STE 10 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
*** Draft Plan of Condominium for 387 units.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Fengate Capital Management LimitedSM37141 · 13 November 2025 · “355 Adelaide Street West”
- Fengate Capital Management LimitedSM37144 · 13 November 2025 · “355 Adelaide Street West”
- Fengate Capital Management LimitedSM37145 · 13 November 2025 · “355 Adelaide Street West”
- Fengate Capital Management LimitedSM37148 · 13 November 2025 · “355 Adelaide Street West”
- 355 Adelaide Nominee IncSM36147 · 25 November 2024 · “16 Oxley Street”
- 355 Adelaide Nominee IncSM36152 · 25 November 2024 · “16 Oxley Street”
- 355 Adelaide Nominee IncSM36152 · 25 November 2024 · “355 Adelaide St W”
- 355 Adelaide Nominee IncSM36147 · 25 November 2024 · “46 Charlotte Street”
- 355 Adelaide Nominee IncSM36152 · 25 November 2024 · “46 Charlotte Street”
- 355 Adelaide Nominee IncSM36143 · 22 November 2024 · “355 Adelaide St W”
- Cityzen Development GroupSM21758 · 5 May 2015 · “46 Charlotte Street”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 10
4 lobbied · 25 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 25 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.