Address · Ward 6 · James Pasternak
1377 Sheppard Ave W
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 6 · James Pasternak
- Location
- 43.74990, -79.48165
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
31- Submitted 19 June 2025Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0296/25NYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 24 March 2025Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 25 133899 NNY 06 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 7 November 2024Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 24 236202 NNY 06 SBUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 28 October 2024Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 24 232020 NNY 06 OZCouncil Approved · Approved
- Submitted 12 September 2021Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 21 211379 NNY 06 SBDraft Plan Approved · Approved
- Submitted 13 December 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A1090/17NYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 13 December 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A1091/17NYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 13 December 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A1092/17NYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 13 December 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A1093/17NYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 13 December 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A1094/17NYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 13 December 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A1095/17NYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 13 December 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A1097/17NYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 13 December 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A1098/17NYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 20 April 2017Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 17 146431 NNY 09 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 13 April 2017Part Lot Control Exemption (PL)Development application 17 144266 NNY 09 PLClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 10 March 2017Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 17 127699 NNY 09 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 20 December 2016Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 16 268887 NNY 09 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 13 December 2016Part Lot Control Exemption (PL)Development application 16 264018 NNY 09 PLClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 22 December 2015Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A1120/15NYNotice Prepared · Approved
- Submitted 11 June 2015Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 15 172297 NNY 09 SBClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 25 February 2015Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 15 121457 NNY 09 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 9 February 2015Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 15 113637 NNY 09 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 24 April 2014Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 14 146577 NNY 09 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 20 March 2014Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 14 131286 NNY 09 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 25 February 2014Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 14 121340 NNY 09 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 14 February 2014Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 14 117649 NNY 09 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 14 February 2014Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 14 117666 NNY 09 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 14 February 2014Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 14 117669 NNY 09 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 20 December 2013Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 13 280352 NNY 09 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 3 September 2010Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 10 252415 NNY 09 SBClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 30 April 2010Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 10 167221 NNY 09 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 31 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0296/25NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 19 June 2025 | Closed Approved |
| 25 133899 NNY 06 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 24 March 2025 | Under Review In progress |
| 24 236202 NNY 06 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 7 November 2024 | Under Review In progress |
| 24 232020 NNY 06 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 28 October 2024 | Council Approved Approved |
| 21 211379 NNY 06 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 12 September 2021 | Draft Plan Approved Approved |
| A1090/17NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 13 December 2017 | Closed Approved |
| A1091/17NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 13 December 2017 | Closed Approved |
| A1092/17NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 13 December 2017 | Closed Approved |
| A1093/17NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 13 December 2017 | Closed Approved |
| A1094/17NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 13 December 2017 | Closed Approved |
| A1095/17NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 13 December 2017 | Closed Approved |
| A1097/17NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 13 December 2017 | Closed Approved |
| A1098/17NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 13 December 2017 | Closed Approved |
| 17 146431 NNY 09 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 20 April 2017 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 17 144266 NNY 09 PL Development application | Part Lot Control Exemption (PL) | 13 April 2017 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 17 127699 NNY 09 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 10 March 2017 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 16 268887 NNY 09 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 20 December 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 16 264018 NNY 09 PL Development application | Part Lot Control Exemption (PL) | 13 December 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| A1120/15NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 22 December 2015 | Notice Prepared Approved |
| 15 172297 NNY 09 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 11 June 2015 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 15 121457 NNY 09 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 25 February 2015 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 15 113637 NNY 09 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 9 February 2015 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 14 146577 NNY 09 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 24 April 2014 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 14 131286 NNY 09 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 20 March 2014 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 14 121340 NNY 09 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 25 February 2014 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 14 117649 NNY 09 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 14 February 2014 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 14 117666 NNY 09 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 14 February 2014 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 14 117669 NNY 09 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 14 February 2014 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 13 280352 NNY 09 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 20 December 2013 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 10 252415 NNY 09 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 3 September 2010 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 10 167221 NNY 09 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 30 April 2010 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.
Council and committee items naming this address
- 1377 Sheppard Avenue West (Downsview West District) - Zoning By-law Amendment - Decision Report - Approval2026.NY34.9 · 7 July 2026
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 6
2 lobbied · 14 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 14 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 6
17 lobbied · 41 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 41 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 6
1 lobbied · 1 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 6
13 lobbied · 16 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 13 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 6
2 lobbied · 2 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Part Lot Control Exemption (PL), City-wide
2 lobbied · 6 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 6 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.