Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 13 280352 NNY 09 SA
50 B Thomas Mulholland Dr; 50 C Thomas Mulholland Dr; 50 D Thomas Mulholland Dr; 50 E Thomas Mulholland Dr; 50 F Thomas Mulholland Dr; 50 G Thomas Mulholland Dr; 50 H Thomas Mulholland Dr; 50 Thomas Mulholland Dr; 60 B Thomas Mulholland Dr; 60 C Thomas Mulholland Dr; 60 D Thomas Mulholland Dr; 60 E Thomas Mulholland Dr; 60 F Thomas Mulholland Dr; 60 G Thomas Mulholland Dr; 60 H Thomas Mulholland Dr; 60 Thomas Mulholland Dr; 70 B Thomas Mulholland Dr; 70 C Thomas Mulholland Dr; 70 D Thomas Mulholland Dr; 70 E Thomas Mulholland Dr; 70 F Thomas Mulholland Dr; 70 G Thomas Mulholland Dr; 70 H Thomas Mulholland Dr; 70 Thomas Mulholland Dr; 80 B Thomas Mulholland Dr; 80 C Thomas Mulholland Dr; 80 D Thomas Mulholland Dr; 80 E Thomas Mulholland Dr; 80 F Thomas Mulholland Dr; 80 G Thomas Mulholland Dr; 80 Thomas Mulholland Dr; 147 Stanley Greene Blvd; 149 Stanley Greene Blvd; 151 Stanley Greene Blvd; 153 Stanley Greene Blvd; 155 Stanley Greene Blvd; 157 Stanley Greene Blvd; 159 Stanley Greene Blvd; 161 Stanley Greene Blvd; 164 Frederick Tisdale Dr; 166 Frederick Tisdale Dr; 168 Frederick Tisdale Dr; 170 Frederick Tisdale Dr; 172 Frederick Tisdale Dr; 174 Frederick Tisdale Dr; 176 Frederick Tisdale Dr; 178 Frederick Tisdale Dr; 201 Downsview Park Blvd; 203 Downsview Park Blvd; 205 Downsview Park Blvd; 207 Downsview Park Blvd; 209 Downsview Park Blvd; 211 Downsview Park Blvd; 213 Downsview Park Blvd; 215 Downsview Park Blvd; 217 Downsview Park Blvd; 219 Downsview Park Blvd; 221 Downsview Park Blvd; 223 Downsview Park Blvd; 225 Downsview Park Blvd; 227 Downsview Park Blvd; 229 Downsview Park Blvd; 231 Downsview Park Blvd; 233 Downsview Park Blvd; 235 Downsview Park Blvd; 237 Downsview Park Blvd; 239 Downsview Park Blvd; 241 Downsview Park Blvd; 243 Downsview Park Blvd; 1377 Sheppard Ave W; 2995 Keele St
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 20 December 2013
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 50 B Thomas Mulholland Dr; 50 C Thomas Mulholland Dr; 50 D Thomas Mulholland Dr; 50 E Thomas Mulholland Dr; 50 F Thomas Mulholland Dr; 50 G Thomas Mulholland Dr; 50 H Thomas Mulholland Dr; 50 Thomas Mulholland Dr; 60 B Thomas Mulholland Dr; 60 C Thomas Mulholland Dr; 60 D Thomas Mulholland Dr; 60 E Thomas Mulholland Dr; 60 F Thomas Mulholland Dr; 60 G Thomas Mulholland Dr; 60 H Thomas Mulholland Dr; 60 Thomas Mulholland Dr; 70 B Thomas Mulholland Dr; 70 C Thomas Mulholland Dr; 70 D Thomas Mulholland Dr; 70 E Thomas Mulholland Dr; 70 F Thomas Mulholland Dr; 70 G Thomas Mulholland Dr; 70 H Thomas Mulholland Dr; 70 Thomas Mulholland Dr; 80 B Thomas Mulholland Dr; 80 C Thomas Mulholland Dr; 80 D Thomas Mulholland Dr; 80 E Thomas Mulholland Dr; 80 F Thomas Mulholland Dr; 80 G Thomas Mulholland Dr; 80 Thomas Mulholland Dr; 147 Stanley Greene Blvd; 149 Stanley Greene Blvd; 151 Stanley Greene Blvd; 153 Stanley Greene Blvd; 155 Stanley Greene Blvd; 157 Stanley Greene Blvd; 159 Stanley Greene Blvd; 161 Stanley Greene Blvd; 164 Frederick Tisdale Dr; 166 Frederick Tisdale Dr; 168 Frederick Tisdale Dr; 170 Frederick Tisdale Dr; 172 Frederick Tisdale Dr; 174 Frederick Tisdale Dr; 176 Frederick Tisdale Dr; 178 Frederick Tisdale Dr; 201 Downsview Park Blvd; 203 Downsview Park Blvd; 205 Downsview Park Blvd; 207 Downsview Park Blvd; 209 Downsview Park Blvd; 211 Downsview Park Blvd; 213 Downsview Park Blvd; 215 Downsview Park Blvd; 217 Downsview Park Blvd; 219 Downsview Park Blvd; 221 Downsview Park Blvd; 223 Downsview Park Blvd; 225 Downsview Park Blvd; 227 Downsview Park Blvd; 229 Downsview Park Blvd; 231 Downsview Park Blvd; 233 Downsview Park Blvd; 235 Downsview Park Blvd; 237 Downsview Park Blvd; 239 Downsview Park Blvd; 241 Downsview Park Blvd; 243 Downsview Park Blvd; 1377 Sheppard Ave W; 2995 Keele St
- Ward
- Ward 6 · James Pasternak
- Submitted
- 20 December 2013
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 10 163808 NNY 10 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
Proposal for 69 freehold condominium (common element) townhouses within Block O (Block 34) of a draft-approved plan of subdivision (Stanley Greene Phase 1).
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 6
17 lobbied · 41 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 41 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.