Address · Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
1331 Yonge Street
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
- Location
- 43.68539, -79.39273
- How this address was located
- Matched to the nearest civic number on the same street in the City's address points. Matched address: 1325 YONGE ST (6 civic numbers away).
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
7These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 6 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 22 St. Paul's | Member of council | 8 | 4 | 14 May 2013 |
| Ward 5 Etobicoke-Lakeshore | Member of council | 3 | 0 | 10 June 2013 |
| Office of Councillor Josh Matlow, Ward 22 | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 8 August 2012 |
| Ward 14 Parkdale-High Park | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 10 June 2013 |
| Ward 3 Etobicoke Centre | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 10 June 2013 |
| Ward 4 Etobicoke Centre | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 10 June 2013 |
All registrations· 7 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM19346 | Aspen Ridge Homes | 1331 Yonge Street | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 27 May 2013 – 12 June 2013 | 5 |
| SM19288 | John and Elizabeth Hallerman | 1331 Yonge Street | Planning and Development Application, Site Plan | 10 May 2013 – 6 September 2013 | 5 |
| SM18344 | Aspen Ridge Homes | 1331 Yonge Street | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Site Plan | 7 August 2012 – 10 August 2013 | 1 |
| SM16350 | Aspen Ridge Homes | 1331 Yonge Street | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 20 May 2011 – 13 November 2020 | 4 |
| SM16226 | Aspen Ridge Homes | 1331 Yonge Street. | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 21 April 2011 – 20 April 2012 | 0 |
| SM12109 | Aspen Ridge Homes | 1331 Yonge Street | Planning Application - Zoning By-law Amendment | 26 August 2008 – 9 February 2012 | 0 |
| SM12172 | Aspen Ridge Homes | 1331 Yonge Street | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan | 26 August 2008 – 13 July 2021 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 24 May 2019Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 19 159234 STE 12 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 13 March 2015Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 15 127154 STE 22 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 11 August 2011Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 11 255341 STE 22 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19 159234 STE 12 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 24 May 2019 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 15 127154 STE 22 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 13 March 2015 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 11 255341 STE 22 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 11 August 2011 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
1331 Yonge St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
11 255341 STE 22 OZ · submitted 11 August 2011 · Closed · from registration SM16350 (Aspen Ridge Homes)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.90
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM16350: Meeting regarding proposed rezoning for 1331 Yonge Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 255341 STE 22 OZ at 1331 Yonge St: OPA and Rezoning application for a new 11 storey mixed use building - 109 residential suites - 3 levels below grade parking - 125 bicycle parking spaces - 4 retail units at grade. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Meeting regarding proposed rezoning for 1331 Yonge Street
Matched fields
- address
- 1331 YONGE ST
- application_address
- 1331 YONGE ST
1331 Yonge St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
11 255341 STE 22 OZ · submitted 11 August 2011 · Closed · from registration SM18344 (Aspen Ridge Homes)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.84
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18344: applications re redevelopment of 1331 Yonge Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 255341 STE 22 OZ at 1331 Yonge St: OPA and Rezoning application for a new 11 storey mixed use building - 109 residential suites - 3 levels below grade parking - 125 bicycle parking spaces - 4 retail units at grade. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: applications re redevelopment of 1331 Yonge Street
Matched fields
- address
- 1331 YONGE ST
- application_address
- 1331 YONGE ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 12
5 lobbied · 11 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 5 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 11 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 12
32 lobbied · 72 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 32 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 3% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 72 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.05 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 12
44 lobbied · 60 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 44 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 14% | 0.02 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.