Development application · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
Development application 19 159234 STE 12 CD
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 24 May 2019
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
- Addresses
- 1331 Yonge Street
- Ward
- Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
- Submitted
- 24 May 2019
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 109 units
- Related file
- 11 255341 STE 22 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Draft Plan of Standard Condominium to permit 109 residential dwelling units in a 11 storey mixed-use building with 178 vehicular parking spaces (161 residential; 17 visitor) in a 5-level underground parking garage.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Aspen Ridge HomesSM19346 · 27 May 2013 · “1331 Yonge Street”
- John and Elizabeth HallermanSM19288 · 10 May 2013 · “1331 Yonge Street”
- Aspen Ridge HomesSM18344 · 7 August 2012 · “1331 Yonge Street”
- Aspen Ridge HomesSM16350 · 20 May 2011 · “1331 Yonge Street”
- Aspen Ridge HomesSM16226 · 21 April 2011 · “1331 Yonge Street.”
- Aspen Ridge HomesSM12109 · 26 August 2008 · “1331 Yonge Street”
- Aspen Ridge HomesSM12172 · 26 August 2008 · “1331 Yonge Street”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 12
5 lobbied · 11 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 5 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 11 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.