Committee of Adjustment application · Consent (severance) (CO)
Committee of Adjustment application B0011/17TEY
- Status
- Closed
- Approved
- Submitted
- 20 January 2017
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Consent (severance) (CO)
- Addresses
- 1100 King St W
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Submitted
- 20 January 2017
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Hearing date
- 19 April 2017
- Decision
- Approved
- Objection at the hearing
- No
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
To obtain consent to sever the lot into commercial and residential components and to create various easements/right-of-ways.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- First Capital REITSM29707 · 4 February 2020 · “1100 King St. W”
- First capital RealtySM27571 · 5 February 2019 · “1100 King St. W”
- King Liberty North CorporationSM27109 · 30 November 2018 · “1100 King Street West”
- King Liberty North CorporationSM19634 · 4 September 2013 · “1100 King Street West”
- UrbancorpSM19119 · 21 March 2013 · “1100 King Street West”
- URBANCORP DEVELOPMENTS INCSM17356 · 20 October 2011 · “1100 KING ST WEST”
- Kilmer Brownfield Management LimitedSM12642 · 8 January 2009 · “1100 King Street W”
- UrbancorpSM11342 · 7 March 2008 · “1100 King Street West.”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.