Address · Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
11 Peel Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
- Location
- 43.64379, -79.42846
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
3These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 18 Davenport | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 26 June 2013 |
| Ward 5 Etobicoke-Lakeshore | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 29 April 2013 |
All registrations· 3 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM19242 | STREETCAR DEVELOPMENT INC | 11 Peel Avenue | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 26 April 2013 – 31 December 2013 | 3 |
| SM17353 | STREETCAR DEVELOPMENT INC | 11 PEEL AVENUE | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 20 October 2011 – 21 October 2013 | 0 |
| SM16855 | Streetcar Developments Inc. | 11 Peel Avenue. | Planning and Development, Planning Policy / Study; Planning and Development Application, Official P… | 26 July 2011 – 31 December 2015 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
8- Submitted 10 January 2025Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0002/25TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 23 August 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0930/17TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 5 April 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0399/17TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 22 March 2016Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 16 131157 STE 18 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 29 January 2016Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0006/16TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 29 June 2015Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 15 182270 STE 18 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 1 November 2011Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 11 302503 STE 18 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 1 November 2011Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 11 302512 STE 18 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 8 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| B0002/25TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 10 January 2025 | Closed Approved |
| A0930/17TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 23 August 2017 | Closed Approved |
| A0399/17TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 5 April 2017 | Closed Approved |
| 16 131157 STE 18 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 22 March 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| B0006/16TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 29 January 2016 | Closed Approved |
| 15 182270 STE 18 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 29 June 2015 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 11 302503 STE 18 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 1 November 2011 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 11 302512 STE 18 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 1 November 2011 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
11 Peel Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
11 302503 STE 18 OZ · submitted 1 November 2011 · Closed · from registration SM17353 (STREETCAR DEVELOPMENT INC)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.83
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM17353: 11 PEEL AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 302503 STE 18 OZ at 11 Peel Ave: Employment Lands Conversion. Proposal to construct multiple buildings including 20 sty condo and low rise residential with a total of 434 residential units, 3 levels of below grade parking, and commercial/non residential at grade. Also see Site Plan Approval. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 11 PEEL AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL.
Matched fields
- address
- 11 PEEL AVE
- application_address
- 11 PEEL AVE
11 Peel Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
11 302503 STE 18 OZ · submitted 1 November 2011 · Closed · from registration SM19242 (STREETCAR DEVELOPMENT INC)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.72
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19242: 11 Peel Avenue -- Redevelopment Application (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 302503 STE 18 OZ at 11 Peel Ave: Employment Lands Conversion. Proposal to construct multiple buildings including 20 sty condo and low rise residential with a total of 434 residential units, 3 levels of below grade parking, and commercial/non residential at grade. Also see Site Plan Approval. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 11 Peel Avenue -- Redevelopment Application
Matched fields
- address
- 11 PEEL AVE
- application_address
- 11 PEEL AVE
11 Peel Ave · Site Plan Approval (SA)
11 302512 STE 18 SA · submitted 1 November 2011 · Closed · from registration SM17353 (STREETCAR DEVELOPMENT INC)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM17353: 11 PEEL AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 302512 STE 18 SA at 11 Peel Ave: Proposal to construct multiple buildings including 20 sty condo and low rise residential with a total of 434 residential units, 3 levels of below grade parking, and commercial/non residential at grade. Also see OPA/Rezonng. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 11 PEEL AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL.
Matched fields
- address
- 11 PEEL AVE
- application_address
- 11 PEEL AVE
11 Peel Ave · Site Plan Approval (SA)
11 302512 STE 18 SA · submitted 1 November 2011 · Closed · from registration SM19242 (STREETCAR DEVELOPMENT INC)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19242: 11 Peel Avenue -- Redevelopment Application (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 302512 STE 18 SA at 11 Peel Ave: Proposal to construct multiple buildings including 20 sty condo and low rise residential with a total of 434 residential units, 3 levels of below grade parking, and commercial/non residential at grade. Also see OPA/Rezonng. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 11 Peel Avenue -- Redevelopment Application
Matched fields
- address
- 11 PEEL AVE
- application_address
- 11 PEEL AVE
11 Peel Ave · Site Plan Approval (SA)
11 302512 STE 18 SA · submitted 1 November 2011 · Closed · from registration SM19286 (Simone Group Properties Limited)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.72
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19286: 1. Purchase of property expropriated by City for Dufferin/Queen interchange realignment and no longer required by City. 2. Planning approvals for 17-21 Peel Avenue. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 302512 STE 18 SA at 11 Peel Ave: Proposal to construct multiple buildings including 20 sty condo and low rise residential with a total of 434 residential units, 3 levels of below grade parking, and commercial/non residential at grade. Also see OPA/Rezonng. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: …propriated by City for Dufferin/Queen interchange realignment and no longer required by City. 2. Planning approvals for 17-21 Peel Avenue.
Matched fields
- address
- 17-21 PEEL AVE
- application_address
- 11 PEEL AVE
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), Ward 9
2 lobbied · 7 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 7 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 9
27 lobbied · 333 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 27 | 169 | 67% (n=27) | 33% | 26% | 29% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 333 | 134 | 95% (n=279) | 5% | 6% | 30% |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 9
20 lobbied · 21 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 0% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 21 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 0% | 0.10 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 9
2 lobbied · 4 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 9
19 lobbied · 28 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 19 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 28 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.