Address · Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
104 Finch Ave E
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
- Location
- 43.78165, -79.40799
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
5- Submitted 31 July 2026Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 26 212314 NNY 18 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 13 July 2026Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0283/26NYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 27 June 2024Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 24 171445 NNY 18 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 10 September 2012Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 12 243511 NNY 24 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 10 September 2012Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 12 243530 NNY 24 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 5 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26 212314 NNY 18 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 31 July 2026 | Under Review In progress |
| A0283/26NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 13 July 2026 | Closed Approved |
| 24 171445 NNY 18 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 27 June 2024 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 12 243511 NNY 24 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 10 September 2012 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 12 243530 NNY 24 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 10 September 2012 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
104 Finch Ave E · Minor variance (MV)
A0283/26NY · submitted 13 July 2026 · Closed · from registration SM37899 (Regency Property Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM37899: Minor Variance Application for 14-storey mid-rise building proposed at 104-114 Finch Avenue E. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0283/26NY at 104 Finch Ave E: To alter the development standards, as approved under Site-Specific Zoning By-law 256-2025, for the proposed 14-storey mixed use building, including to increase the gross floor area and, building height, and modifications to the setbacks, amenity space and bicycle parking requirements. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Minor Variance Application for 14-storey mid-rise building proposed at 104-114 Finch Avenue E.
Matched fields
- address
- 104-114 FINCH AVE E
- application_address
- 104 FINCH AVE E
104 Finch Ave E · Minor variance (MV)
A0283/26NY · submitted 13 July 2026 · Closed · from registration SM37901 (Regency Property Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.87
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM37901: Minor Variance Application for a 14-storey mid-rise building proposed at 104-114 Finch Avenue E. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0283/26NY at 104 Finch Ave E: To alter the development standards, as approved under Site-Specific Zoning By-law 256-2025, for the proposed 14-storey mixed use building, including to increase the gross floor area and, building height, and modifications to the setbacks, amenity space and bicycle parking requirements. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Minor Variance Application for a 14-storey mid-rise building proposed at 104-114 Finch Avenue E.
Matched fields
- address
- 104-114 FINCH AVE E
- application_address
- 104 FINCH AVE E
104 Finch Ave E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
24 171445 NNY 18 OZ · submitted 27 June 2024 · Closed · from registration SM36246 (Regency Property Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.90
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM36246: 104-114 Finch Avenue East proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 24 171445 NNY 18 OZ at 104 Finch Ave E: Proposal for a mixed-use development in the form of an 11-storey mid-rise building with ground floor retail fronting Finch Avenue East. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 104-114 Finch Avenue East proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application.
Matched fields
- address
- 104-114 FINCH AVE E
- application_address
- 104 FINCH AVE E
104 Finch Ave E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
24 171445 NNY 18 OZ · submitted 27 June 2024 · Closed · from registration SM36247 (Regency Property Inc.)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.90
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM36247: 104-114 Finch Avenue East proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 24 171445 NNY 18 OZ at 104 Finch Ave E: Proposal for a mixed-use development in the form of an 11-storey mid-rise building with ground floor retail fronting Finch Avenue East. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 104-114 Finch Avenue East proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application.
Matched fields
- address
- 104-114 FINCH AVE E
- application_address
- 104 FINCH AVE E
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 18
18 lobbied · 125 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 18 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 125 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 18
9 lobbied · 202 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 9 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 202 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 18
37 lobbied · 63 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 37 | — | 100% (n=8) | 0% | 24% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 63 | — | 64% (n=5) | 36% | 16% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.