Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 18 272231 ESC 22 OZ

20 Cowdray Crt; 40 Cowdray Crt; 50 Cowdray Crt; 70 Cowdray Crt; 80 Cowdray Crt; 100 Cowdray Crt

Ward 22 · Nick MantasDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 27 December 2018; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 20 Cowdray Crt; 40 Cowdray Crt; 50 Cowdray Crt; 70 Cowdray Crt; 80 Cowdray Crt; 100 Cowdray Crt
Ward: Ward 22 · Nick Mantas
Submitted: 27 December 2018
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 2,009 units

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Multi-phased, high density, mixed use development including 2,009 residential dwelling units and new office commercial uses on 6 blocks of land on Cowdray Court. Grade related and mid-rise buildings along with five apartment towers ranging in height from 18 to 40 storeys are proposed along with the expansion of Collingwood Park. Re-alignment of Cowdray Court and a new public road system, including future public road connections, are proposed. Roads, development and park blocks to be created by plan of subdivision. Cross refererence with 18 272239 ESC 22 SB.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Gemterra Developments Inc.
SM27272 · 3 January 2019 · “100 Cowdray Court”
Gemterra Developments Inc.
SM24618 · 25 May 2017 · “100 Cowdray Court”
Gemterra Developments Inc.
SM24613 · 25 May 2017 · “50 Cowdray Ct”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 22

6 lobbied · 8 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=78
Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied14%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 22: 6 lobbied and 8 matched unlobbied applications in 4 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	6	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	8	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	571	—	100% (n=78)	0%	12%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	760	—	96% (n=78)	4%	14%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.