Address · Ward 5 · Frances Nunziata
10 Locust St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 5 · Frances Nunziata
- Location
- 43.68827, -79.49074
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 17 May 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 156080 WET 05 SAFinal Approval Completed · Approved
- Submitted 6 February 2020Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 20 113215 WET 05 OZAppeal Received · In progress
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 156080 WET 05 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 17 May 2021 | Final Approval Completed Approved |
| 20 113215 WET 05 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 6 February 2020 | Appeal Received In progress |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
8 Locust St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
21 156080 WET 05 SA · submitted 17 May 2021 · Final Approval Completed · from registration SM34393 (8-16 Locust Street LP)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.93
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM34393: 8 – 16 Locust Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 156080 WET 05 SA at 8 Locust St: Site plan application for a proposed 37-storey (113.9 metres) residential tower. The proposal includes a total gross floor area of 25,862 sq m and would have a Floor Space Index of 9.7 times the area of the lot. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 8 – 16 Locust Street
Matched fields
- address
- 16 LOCUST ST
- application_address
- 16 LOCUST ST
10 Locust St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
20 113215 WET 05 OZ · submitted 6 February 2020 · Appeal Received · from registration SM32364 (Fengate Capital Management Limited)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM32364: We will discuss the demolition of five vacant single-family homes (8-16 Locust St), where two of them (8 and 12) are subject to rental replacement by-law to accommodate the development of a new 35 Storey building. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 113215 WET 05 OZ at 10 Locust St: An Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit a proposed 35-storey (110.6 metres) residential tower. The proposal includes a total gross floor area of 25,787sq m and would have a Floor Space Index of 9.7 times the area of the lot. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: We will discuss the demolition of five vacant single-family homes (8-16 Locust St), where two of them (8 and 12) are subject to rental replacement by-law to accommodate the development of a new 35 Stor…
Matched fields
- address
- 8-16 LOCUST ST
- application_address
- 8 LOCUST ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 5
15 lobbied · 40 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 15 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 40 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 5
12 lobbied · 17 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 12 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.