lobbyTO

Registration SM37716 · consultant

Ontario Retirement Communities Association

Communications
1
1 offices contacted
Lobbyists
1
Linked agenda items
1
Published links only
Linked applications
0
Published links only

Who

Client
Ontario Retirement Communities Association
Consultant firm
StrategyCorp Inc.
Registrant
Richard Ositashvili
Type
consultant
Status
active
Dates
Approved 12 June 2026; 12 June 2026 to 10 June 2027
Topic (lobbyTO)
Development charges and community benefits (assigned by a decision model from the registration text)

Subject matter

  • Planning and Development
  • Seniors

Source: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry (open data). Dataset page.

Particulars

To engage the municipality in development charge reductions and support Development Charge Reduction Program (DCRP) application.

Automated summary of the registration text

registered, communicating about development charge reductions and Development Charge Reduction Program (DCRP) application

Generated from the registration text only. Read the particulars for the registrant's own words.

Lobbyists

Organisations named

Communications

Communications per month

2026-06 to 2026-06

1 communication

How and with whom

By method · 0 meetings

By office holder

Most-contacted offices

Offices contacted· 1 row
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Olivia ChowMember of council1012 June 2026
All communications· 1 row
1 communications recorded
DateOfficeOffice holder (as recorded)Member's officeMethodLobbyist
12 June 2026MayorOlivia Chow
Member of council
Olivia ChowEmail
E-mail
—

"Member's office" is the member of council whose office was contacted (the member or their staff), resolved from the office holder name and office recorded in the registry.

Linked agenda items

This link is inferred by lobbyTO; the registry does not record which agenda item a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Linked development applications

No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.