lobbyTO

Registration SM36132 · in-house

WSP Canada Inc.

Communications
1
1 offices contacted
Lobbyists
2
Linked agenda items
1
Published links only
Linked applications
0
Published links only

Who

Client
WSP Canada Inc.
Registrant
Janet Oh
Type
in-house
Status
closed
Dates
Approved 21 November 2024; 21 November 2024 to 30 June 2025
Topic (lobbyTO)
Construction and engineering contracts (assigned by a decision model from the registration text)

Subject matter

  • Arts / Culture
  • Technology

Source: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry (open data). Dataset page.

Particulars

The City of Toronto seeks an expert to assess Nathan Phillips Square and define specs for a sound monitoring system ensuring bylaw compliance. A meeting/call will showcase WSP Acoustics’ expertise in delivering similar solutions.

Automated summary of the registration text

WSP Acoustics is registered, communicating about delivering sound monitoring system solutions for Nathan Phillips Square.

Generated from the registration text only. Read the particulars for the registrant's own words.

Lobbyists

Organisations named

Communications

Communications per month

2025-01 to 2025-01

1 communication

How and with whom

By method · 0 meetings

By office holder

Most-contacted offices

  • Technology ServicesCity staff1
Offices contacted· 1 row
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Technology ServicesCity staff1022 January 2025
All communications· 1 row
1 communications recorded
DateOfficeOffice holder (as recorded)Member's officeMethodLobbyist
22 January 2025Technology Services—
City staff
—Call
Telephone
Romain Dumoulin

"Member's office" is the member of council whose office was contacted (the member or their staff), resolved from the office holder name and office recorded in the registry.

Linked agenda items

This link is inferred by lobbyTO; the registry does not record which agenda item a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Linked development applications

No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.