lobbyTO

Registration SM25290 · consultant

May Taverna

Status: closed10 November 2017 to 10 May 2019Source datasetReport an error on this page
Communications
1
1 offices contacted
Lobbyists
1
Linked agenda items
0
Published links only
Linked applications
2
Published links only

Who

Client
May Taverna
Consultant firm
Bousfields Inc.
Registrant
Mike Dror
Type
consultant
Status
closed
Dates
Approved 10 November 2017; 10 November 2017 to 10 May 2019

Subject matter

  • Planning and Development Application, Official Plan
  • Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law

Source: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry (open data). Dataset page.

Particulars

Applications in support of redevelopment of 260-264 Finch Avenue East

Addresses named: 260-264 Finch Avenue East (Ward 18)

Automated summary of the registration text

Registered, communicating about applications in support of redevelopment of 260-264 Finch Avenue East

Generated from the registration text only. Read the particulars for the registrant's own words.

Lobbyists

Organisations named

Communications

Communications per month

2017-12 to 2017-12

1 communication

How and with whom

By method · 1 meeting

By office holder

Most-contacted offices

  • Ward 24 WillowdaleMember of council1
Offices contacted· 1 row
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Ward 24 WillowdaleMember of council1114 December 2017
All communications· 1 row
1 communications recorded
DateOfficeOffice holder (as recorded)Member's officeMethodLobbyist
14 December 2017Ward 24 WillowdaleDavid Shiner
Member of council
—Meeting—

"Member's office" is the member of council whose office was contacted (the member or their staff), resolved from the office holder name and office recorded in the registry.

Linked agenda items

No published links to agenda items.

Linked development applications

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored