lobbyTO

Registration SM19880 · in-house

Sprung Structures

Status: closed by lro26 November 2013 to 31 March 2025Topic: Construction and engineering contractsSource datasetReport an error on this page
Communications
1
1 offices contacted
Lobbyists
4
Linked agenda items
2
Published links only
Linked applications
0
Published links only

Who

Client
Sprung Structures
Registrant
Tom Lloyd
Type
in-house
Status
closed by lro
Dates
Approved 29 November 2013; 26 November 2013 to 31 March 2025
Topic (lobbyTO)
Construction and engineering contracts (assigned by a decision model from the registration text)

Subject matter

  • Attractions / Tourism
  • Real Estate / Property (City-owned)
  • Recreation

Source: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry (open data). Dataset page.

Particulars

Utilizing Sprung Structures as a preferred building solution for all city needs 3 stories and under.

Automated summary of the registration text

Registered, communicating about utilizing Sprung Structures as a preferred building solution for all city needs 3 stories and under.

Generated from the registration text only. Read the particulars for the registrant's own words.

Lobbyists

Organisations named

Communications

Communications per month

2024-11 to 2024-11

1 communication

How and with whom

By method · 1 meeting

By office holder

Most-contacted offices

  • Toronto Shelter & Support ServicesCity staff1
Offices contacted· 1 row
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Toronto Shelter & Support ServicesCity staff1125 November 2024
All communications· 1 row
1 communications recorded
DateOfficeOffice holder (as recorded)Member's officeMethodLobbyist
25 November 2024Toronto Shelter & Support Services—
City staff
—MeetingCarolyn Hooper

"Member's office" is the member of council whose office was contacted (the member or their staff), resolved from the office holder name and office recorded in the registry.

Linked agenda items

This link is inferred by lobbyTO; the registry does not record which agenda item a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Linked development applications

No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.