lobbyTO

Registration SM17930 · consultant

Amexon Developments Inc.

Status: closed by lro21 March 2012 to 21 March 2015Source datasetReport an error on this page
Communications
1
1 offices contacted
Lobbyists
1
Linked agenda items
0
Published links only
Linked applications
2
Published links only

Who

Client
Amexon Developments Inc.
Consultant firm
McMillan LLP
Registrant
Mary Flynn-Guglietti
Type
consultant
Status
closed by lro
Dates
Approved 21 March 2012; 21 March 2012 to 21 March 2015

Subject matter

  • Planning and Development Application, Official Plan
  • Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law

Source: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry (open data). Dataset page.

Particulars

Seeking approval for a high density mixed-use development for property municipally known as 480 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1V7.

Addresses named: 480 University Ave (Ward 11)

Automated summary of the registration text

Registered, communicating about seeking approval for a high density mixed-use development

Generated from the registration text only. Read the particulars for the registrant's own words.

Lobbyists

Organisations named

Communications

Communications per month

2012-03 to 2012-03

1 communication

How and with whom

By method · 1 meeting

By office holder

Most-contacted offices

  • Ward 20 Trinity-SpadinaMember of council1
Offices contacted· 1 row
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Ward 20 Trinity-SpadinaMember of council1130 March 2012
All communications· 1 row
1 communications recorded
DateOfficeOffice holder (as recorded)Member's officeMethodLobbyist
30 March 2012Ward 20 Trinity-SpadinaAdam Vaughan
Member of council
—Meeting—

"Member's office" is the member of council whose office was contacted (the member or their staff), resolved from the office holder name and office recorded in the registry.

Linked agenda items

No published links to agenda items.

Linked development applications

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored