lobbyTO

Registration SM15985 · in-house

Winona Park Developments

Status: closed by lro23 February 2011 to 31 December 2017Topic: Plans of subdivision and condominiumSource datasetReport an error on this page
Communications
1
1 offices contacted
Lobbyists
1
Linked agenda items
0
Published links only
Linked applications
2
Published links only

Who

Client
Winona Park Developments
Registrant
Moshe Eichorn
Type
in-house
Status
closed by lro
Dates
Approved 23 February 2011; 23 February 2011 to 31 December 2017
Topic (lobbyTO)
Plans of subdivision and condominium (assigned by a decision model from the registration text)

Subject matter

  • Planning and Development Application, Plan of Condominium
  • Planning and Development Application, Site Plan
  • Planning and Development Application, Minor Variance

Source: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry (open data). Dataset page.

Particulars

464-468 Winona Dr.

Addresses named: 464 - 468 Winona Drive (Ward 12)

Lobbyists

Organisations named

Communications

Communications per month

2011-03 to 2011-03

1 communication

How and with whom

By method · 1 meeting

By office holder

Most-contacted offices

  • Ward 15 Eglinton-LawrenceMember of council1
Offices contacted· 1 row
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Ward 15 Eglinton-LawrenceMember of council117 March 2011
All communications· 1 row
1 communications recorded
DateOfficeOffice holder (as recorded)Member's officeMethodLobbyist
7 March 2011Ward 15 Eglinton-LawrenceJosh Colle
Member of council
—MeetingMoshe Eichorn

"Member's office" is the member of council whose office was contacted (the member or their staff), resolved from the office holder name and office recorded in the registry.

Linked agenda items

No published links to agenda items.

Linked development applications

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored