Committee of Adjustment application · Consent (severance) (CO)
Committee of Adjustment application B0014/17SC
- Status
- Closed
- Approved
- Submitted
- 8 April 2017
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Consent (severance) (CO)
- Addresses
- 69 Homestead Rd
- Ward
- Ward 25 · Neethan Shan
- Submitted
- 8 April 2017
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Hearing date
- 1 June 2017
- Decision
- Approved
- Objection at the hearing
- Not recorded
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
This application was approved by the Committee of Adjustment in January 2016, the applicant did not satisfy the conditions and the consent lapsed. The application remains the same. This application is for consent to sever the land into two lots. The lot to be created Part 2 would have a frontage of 11.31 metres and a lot area of 474.6 square metres. The lot to be created Part 1 would have a frontage of 11.31 metres and a lot area of 472.76 square metres. The proposed lots are shown on the attached Lot Division Plan. The owner is proposing to demolish the existing house and build two new detached houses.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.