Committee of Adjustment application · Consent (severance) (CO)
Committee of Adjustment application B0010/23SC
- Status
- Closed
- Approved
- Submitted
- 16 February 2023
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Consent (severance) (CO)
- Addresses
- 2911 Eglinton Ave E
- Ward
- Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
- Submitted
- 16 February 2023
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Hearing date
- 28 June 2023
- Decision
- Approved
- Objection at the hearing
- Not recorded
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
Consent to sever the lands to allow development for a new SmartStop self storage and to allow for vehicular and servicing access. This property is subject to a Site Plan Application (21 245218 ESC 20 SA) and a Zoning By-law Amendment Application (21 245219 ESC 20 OZ) both currently under review.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- SST VI 2911 Eglinton Ave E, Co.SM35194 · 5 January 2024 · “2911 Eglinton Ave E”
- SmartCentres REITSM34814 · 15 September 2023 · “2911 Eglinton Avenue East”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.