Address · Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
2911 Eglinton Ave E
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
- Location
- 43.73861, -79.23687
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 3 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transportation Services | City staff | 13 | 1 | 18 September 2024 |
| Engineering & Construction Services | City staff | 2 | 1 | 18 September 2024 |
| Engineering and Construction Services | City staff | 2 | 0 | 10 September 2024 |
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM35194 | SST VI 2911 Eglinton Ave E, Co. | 2911 Eglinton Ave E | Planning and Development; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Develop… | 5 January 2024 – 8 July 2026 | 17 |
| SM34814 | SmartCentres REIT | 2911 Eglinton Avenue East | Planning and Development; Transportation; Transportation - Roads / Bridges | 15 September 2023 – 31 December 2026 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 16 February 2023Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0010/23SCClosed · Approved
- Submitted 5 December 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 245218 ESC 20 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 5 December 2021Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 21 245219 ESC 20 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| B0010/23SC Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 16 February 2023 | Closed Approved |
| 21 245218 ESC 20 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 5 December 2021 | Under Review In progress |
| 21 245219 ESC 20 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 5 December 2021 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
2911 Eglinton Ave E · Site Plan Approval (SA)
21 245218 ESC 20 SA · submitted 5 December 2021 · Under Review · from registration SM35194 (SST VI 2911 Eglinton Ave E, Co.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35194: 2911 Eglinton Ave E, Scarborough, ON (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 245218 ESC 20 SA at 2911 Eglinton Ave E: The application seeks amendments to the City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 and the Former City of Scarborough Eglinton Community By-law 10048 to permit development on the southeast corner of the subject lands for a 6-storey self-storage facility. The proposed development will have a gross floor… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 2911 Eglinton Ave E, Scarborough, ON
Matched fields
- address
- 2911 EGLINTON AVE E
- application_address
- 2911 EGLINTON AVE E
2911 Eglinton Ave E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
21 245219 ESC 20 OZ · submitted 5 December 2021 · Closed · from registration SM35194 (SST VI 2911 Eglinton Ave E, Co.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.88
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35194: 2911 Eglinton Ave E, Scarborough, ON (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 245219 ESC 20 OZ at 2911 Eglinton Ave E: The application seeks amendments to the City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 and the Former City of Scarborough Eglinton Community By-law 10048 to permit development on the southeast corner of the subject lands for a 6-storey self-storage facility. The proposed development will have a gross floor… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 2911 Eglinton Ave E, Scarborough, ON
Matched fields
- address
- 2911 EGLINTON AVE E
- application_address
- 2911 EGLINTON AVE E
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 20
11 lobbied · 34 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 11 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 34 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 20
13 lobbied · 19 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 13 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 19 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.