lobbyTO

Committee of Adjustment application · Consent (severance) (CO)

Committee of Adjustment application B0002/17NY

2710 Bayview Ave

Status
Conditional Consent
Approved
Submitted
6 January 2017
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
1
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
8
0 meetings · 2 offices

Application record

Type
Consent (severance) (CO)
Addresses
2710 Bayview Ave
Ward
Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos Lin
Submitted
6 January 2017
Status
Conditional Consent
Outcome recorded
Approved
Hearing date
4 May 2017
Decision
Approved
Objection at the hearing
Not recorded
Appealed
No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

To obtain consent to sever the lands to create a separate building lot to construct a new detached dwelling. Related planning files include 15 267780 NNY 25 OZ and 16 21 2893 NNY 25 SA. The related rezoning and site plan applications permit townhouses along Bayview Avenue with a total of 20 units. One detached dwelling is proposed west of the townhouses on Caldy Court (subject of this consent) and will have access from Caldy Court.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 8 communications · 0 meetings · 2 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
  • Office of Councillor Jaye Robinson, Ward 157
  • Ward 25 Don Valley West1
Data table· 2 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Office of Councillor Jaye Robinson, Ward 15Councillor staff7022 June 2021
Ward 25 Don Valley WestMember of council1028 November 2017

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Consent (severance) (CO), Ward 15

2 lobbied · 26 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide

26 lobbied · 179 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied184
  • Matched, unlobbied115

Approval rate

  • Lobbied79% n=24
  • Matched, unlobbied88% n=133

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied21%
  • Matched, unlobbied12%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied15%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%

Objection rate

  • Lobbied25%
  • Matched, unlobbied25%
Data table· 4 rows
Consent (severance) (CO), Ward 15: 2 lobbied and 26 matched unlobbied applications in 2 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateObjection rate
Lobbied2Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied26Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide: 26 lobbied and 179 matched unlobbied applications in 21 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateObjection rate
Lobbied2618479% (n=24)21%15%25%
Matched, unlobbied17911588% (n=133)12%3%25%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.