Committee of Adjustment application · Minor variance (MV)
Committee of Adjustment application A1330/17TEY
- Status
- Closed
- Approved
- Submitted
- 30 November 2017
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Minor variance (MV)
- Addresses
- 70 Carlton St
- Ward
- Ward 13 · Chris Moise
- Submitted
- 30 November 2017
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Hearing date
- 17 May 2018
- Decision
- Approved
- Objection at the hearing
- No
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
To alter the redevelopment plan for a 37-storey mixed use building under construction, approved under site-specific by-law 529-2016 (OMB), by increasing the building height, increasing the gross floor area, increasing the number of dwelling units, reducing the required number of parking spaces, and reducing the minimum required indoor and outdoor amenity space.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Tribute Communities · registration SM23547
70-72 Carlton Street
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.72
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM23547: 70-72 Carlton Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A1330/17TEY at 70 Carlton St: To alter the redevelopment plan for a 37-storey mixed use building under construction, approved under site-specific by-law 529-2016 (OMB), by increasing the building height, increasing the gross floor area, increasing the number of dwelling units, reducing the required number of parking spaces, and… (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 70-72 Carlton Street
Matched fields
- address
- 70-72 CARLTON ST
- application_address
- 70 CARLTON ST
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 1 communication · 1 meeting · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 27 September 2016 |
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 13
5 lobbied · 76 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 5 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 76 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.