Committee of Adjustment application · Minor variance (MV)

Committee of Adjustment application A1293/15TEY

Ward 10 · Ausma MalikDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Approved
Submitted: 23 December 2015; Appealed
Linked lobbying registrations: 1; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 1; 1 meeting · 1 office

Application record

Type: Minor variance (MV)
Addresses: 60 Atlantic Ave
Ward: Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
Submitted: 23 December 2015
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Approved
Hearing date: 6 April 2016
Decision: Approved
Objection at the hearing: No
Appealed: Yes

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

To construct a new five-storey commercial building with two levels of below-grade parking on the lot adjacent to the existing two-storey commercial building on the lot.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Hullmark Developments Limited · registration SM22659
60 Atlantic Avenue - We have applied for Site Plan approval for this property to building a new 5 storey office building. A Minor Variance application is required to allow the development. Permit app…
Evidence High confidence · score 0.90
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM22659: 60 Atlantic Avenue - We have applied for Site Plan approval for this property to building a new 5 storey office building. A Minor Variance application is required to allow the development. Permit applications will be applied for in April 2016 (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A1293/15TEY at 60 Atlantic Ave: To construct a new five-storey commercial building with two levels of below-grade parking on the lot adjacent to the existing two-storey commercial building on the lot. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 60 Atlantic Avenue - We have applied for Site Plan approval for this property to building a new 5 storey office building. A Minor Variance…
Matched fields
address
60 ATLANTIC AVE
application_address
60 ATLANTIC AVE

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 1 communication · 1 meeting · 1 office contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Councillor Gord Perks, Ward 141

Data table· 1 row

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Councillor Gord Perks, Ward 14	Councillor staff	1	1	2 June 2016

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Minor variance (MV), Ward 10

20 lobbied · 261 matched

Median days

Lobbied136
Matched, unlobbied138

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=20
Matched, unlobbied93% n=214

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied7%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied5%

Objection rate

Lobbied14%
Matched, unlobbied18%

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 10: 20 lobbied and 261 matched unlobbied applications in 8 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	20	136	100% (n=20)	0%	0%	14%
Matched, unlobbied	261	138	93% (n=214)	7%	5%	18%

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.