Committee of Adjustment application · Minor variance (MV)
Committee of Adjustment application A1222/16TEY
- Status
- Closed
- Refused
- Submitted
- 13 December 2016
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Minor variance (MV)
- Addresses
- 376 Dufferin Street
- Ward
- Ward 4 · Gord Perks
- Submitted
- 13 December 2016
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Refused
- Hearing date
- 26 April 2017
- Decision
- Refused
- Objection at the hearing
- Yes
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
To renovate the existing one-storey industrial building to include a craft brewery, retail store and associated outdoor patio.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Hullmark Developments Limited · registration SM23584
376 Dufferin Street - We have recently purchased this property. It is currently vacant. We have an interested party willing to lease the space, but it will require minor variance permissions.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.74
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM23584: 376 Dufferin Street - We have recently purchased this property. It is currently vacant. We have an interested party willing to lease the space, but it will require minor variance permissions. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A1222/16TEY at 376 Dufferin St: To renovate the existing one-storey industrial building to include a craft brewery, retail store and associated outdoor patio. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 376 Dufferin Street - We have recently purchased this property. It is currently vacant. We have an interested party willing to lease the sp…
Matched fields
- address
- 376 DUFFERIN ST
- application_address
- 376 DUFFERIN ST
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 1 communication · 0 meetings · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 14 Parkdale-High Park | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 6 March 2017 |
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 4
8 lobbied · 130 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 130 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.