Committee of Adjustment application · Minor variance (MV)
Committee of Adjustment application A1183/19TEY
- Status
- Closed
- Approved
- Submitted
- 15 November 2019
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Minor variance (MV)
- Addresses
- 184 Highbourne Rd
- Ward
- Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
- Submitted
- 15 November 2019
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Hearing date
- 4 November 2020
- Decision
- Approved
- Objection at the hearing
- No
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
To legalize and maintain the two basement secondary suites in the existing two-storey detached house. The three rear yard parking spaces will also be maintained.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
184 Highbourne Road Limited · registration SM29676
184 Highbourne Road: We are assisting the owner with securing minor variances and may need to contact the area Councillor in future to obtain their assistance.
Evidence High confidence · score 0.91
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM29676: 184 Highbourne Road: We are assisting the owner with securing minor variances and may need to contact the area Councillor in future to obtain their assistance. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A1183/19TEY at 184 Highbourne Rd: To legalize and maintain the two basement secondary suites in the existing two-storey detached house. The three rear yard parking spaces will also be maintained. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 184 Highbourne Road: We are assisting the owner with securing minor variances and may need to contact the area Councillor in future to obta…
Matched fields
- address
- 184 HIGHBOURNE RD
- application_address
- 184 HIGHBOURNE RD
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsNo communications recorded.
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 12
20 lobbied · 357 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | 106 | 50% (n=12) | 50% | 35% | 86% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 357 | 145 | 90% (n=291) | 10% | 5% | 30% |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.