Committee of Adjustment application · Minor variance (MV)
Committee of Adjustment application A1176/19TEY
- Status
- Closed
- Approved
- Submitted
- 18 November 2019
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Minor variance (MV)
- Addresses
- 2376 Dundas St W
- Ward
- Ward 4 · Gord Perks
- Submitted
- 18 November 2019
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Hearing date
- 2 December 2020
- Decision
- Approved
- Objection at the hearing
- Yes
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
To alter the development plan for the 24 storey mixed-use development by constructing an additional three storeys and adjusting occupant and visitor bicycle parking requirements.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Queenswell Ltd. · registration SM29393
2376 Dundas Street West, Toronto
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM29393: 2376 Dundas Street West, Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A1176/19TEY at 2376 Dundas St W: To alter the development plan for the 24 storey mixed-use development by constructing an additional three storeys and adjusting occupant and visitor bicycle parking requirements. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 2376 Dundas Street West, Toronto
Matched fields
- address
- 2376 DUNDAS ST W
- application_address
- 2376 DUNDAS ST W
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 1 communication · 1 meeting · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 4 Parkdale-High Park | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 16 December 2019 |
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Queenswell Ltd.SM28132 · 2 May 2019 · “2376 Dundas Street West”
- Dunwest Properties Ltd.SM26900 · 26 October 2018 · “2376 Dundas Street West.”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 4
8 lobbied · 130 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 130 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.